Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 -
gvithal <gvithal@gmail.com> Fri, 26 July 2013 18:12 UTC
Return-Path: <gvithal@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9872E11E8114 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eRl-hqd0494C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:12:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DDC711E8126 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:12:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id m46so2149453wev.22 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5HGrW9tewqM/OGJ44gYhq2AZZQFG+6r0YZMc3bfDIjc=; b=uPde5/5Yxz1ALR02wJa8iri5vpih17MglmdatEQEBB2eAKhcti+ZdHnXqUoz8lKfc/ jdGBGUHezth6K4rpbni3l6VJpXgYi0Tac+8QQ47EBe4PO4VbHrSgZ59Kdt/Zj0zRTzWK JO1rpqXKgQuOoXkVrq8FPGH1KH9NzX1SBfHFuuRTxvMD0ylfFmlJEGRGQP0STlFLAZRA vco/EAaOaasMNAhm+1p7uLc7fbtjfXf0mCHjs5oEqVyYx/3oscUduCTJBvK1c3JZxSg/ sD6qTr08AzFQBtLA+78OQb9WuYtvUlfsIheUShDlZ72diwsORpqPYHU2FtZICDpG/5Q8 1LGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=5HGrW9tewqM/OGJ44gYhq2AZZQFG+6r0YZMc3bfDIjc=; b=PgLQ4yJ70Cl4WWam521/ROub4ds5ISPPxzqWbwCTFVaROcAPgABmDptVJ7elbVcUtc IQLVnU42fj2jyWaPKwi+ELzOrAUmjYVchaMpJ+GH1VMHOVCruE4WQ8/NwoY/4vve/AJp aR2B/1g64yc5AnWNOtndvucLQIBEGEDpcqgiO1pzUWVfyaSN7Tb92iAadsilTKn6LUGy T83Ty2P9qdzEultY9Y3WALXhWEqIKCVLC19EGCSicSyuZvPmLV6E8U0cWDY/WvpBoY9F cNsWJtcbFl7HCg1PRdBl9zsh4rKng5pjLUrfuh3jQN+JBTLldhTVFnRogNhjM4IviFA0 ax6A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.185.49 with SMTP id ez17mr6541491wic.12.1374862362274; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:12:42 -0700 (PDT)
From: gvithal <gvithal@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:12:42 -0700
Message-ID: <4550687096156572689@unknownmsgid>
To: "sthaug@nethelp.no" <sthaug@nethelp.no>, "stenc@s-carlsen.dk" <stenc@s-carlsen.dk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 -
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 18:12:46 -0000
Respond by August 9, 2013! MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Same here. I have reviewed earlier versions of this document. DHCPv6 failover is definitely required and I am support the WG taking this up. Sent from my Windows Phone From: sthaug@nethelp.no Sent: =E2=80=8E7/=E2=80=8E26/=E2=80=8E2013 22:28 To: stenc@s-carlsen.dk Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 - Respond by August 9, 2013! > I have not had the time to read the proposal yet, I believe it is useful > to have failover available for larger installations. >=20 > So, please don't drop it. Same thing here. I'm on vacation with rather poor Internet access (happens to be the U.S., but that's another discussion). I'm very definitely interested in this draft. Steinar Haug, AS 2116 >=20 > On 26/07/13 17:42, Tomek Mrugalski wrote: > > On 19.07.2013 15:59, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote: > >> Folks, the authors of draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design-03 > >> (http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-failover-design) > >> believe it is ready for working group last call. Please review this > >> draft and indicate whether or not you feel it is ready to be published= . > >> Your input is important! > > I support this work moving forward. It doesn't count much, as I'm co-au= thor. > > > > I'm somewhat disappointed with the complete lack of any comments. When > > we started the work on v6 failover, there was exactly 20 people > > expressing their interest in this work that wanted to join the the > > effort. A year and a half passed and now there seems to be noone to eve= n > > say "yeah, it's ok". > > > > A week has passed for this WGLC already. WGLC will end in 2 weeks, so > > there's still plenty of time for a through review. If you want to have > > v6 failover, respond. Make no mistake - without sufficient support, thi= s > > work will fail WGLC. > > > > If you have time - please review it. If you are busy or just don't care > > about the details, saying that you support this work is useful and you > > want it to move forward is helpful, too. > > > > Tomek > > > > _______________________________________________ > > dhcwg mailing list > > dhcwg@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >=20 > --=20 > Best regards >=20 > Sten Carlsen >=20 > No improvements come from shouting: >=20 > "MALE BOVINE MANURE!!!"=20 >=20 _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg