Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8415 (6269)

Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com> Thu, 03 September 2020 19:46 UTC

Return-Path: <tim@qacafe.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8513A1228 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:46:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=qacafe.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GTxWJXh2V47i for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:46:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D3B73A1229 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Sep 2020 12:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id v23so5229014ljd.1 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:46:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=qacafe.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ta7RrUQ4IdBmZDlkDjVYwN/Fk66Hp3yKl9Zp0tNQAGA=; b=TBQIVt5hQ96JhmvigUpK7ev9GqBA//zOlqEBi89JJU/psrUO/mEOwVTvC6quwzmnF/ ObZRPX5tnG3hE7pAcDG9LlUePIyrFmxJGg4R1bLe8fFHn/TeDp4B2gZHPa2d0ZGd0V4o NUwXwX18gzF8xyPElUY+2pRpADOSp5+8Offag=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ta7RrUQ4IdBmZDlkDjVYwN/Fk66Hp3yKl9Zp0tNQAGA=; b=U/tmFWHaSjNH5VudEnDsJ0BulgQ//gjl/b1gkZBjXMy9AGEOvE+gt9RASlAkc4liRq 9w2oeJjWy63sOQNsq0Brfq4PMSRF417zNOtwn9MCG9TRD/coNCeaslvpXZnhMKkCaFrF +V3Tia03h4VwV8YC+ZxxYsqGudu+U6L9aXpBqs+r2K7sGl4C2TchnxcCo/IaLQbiPLHq dRlZNBdt4p0Ar1ZnaEazX3SihdI4+ufxs0n1ciobdZveLxE1vJ9Uw35wf5TkRxiB3XiE HUF8HRMKwqhNYmu5grdlTnVql+MRbHvdCwkt4ruMAWr7vJBwkEF3jq3iFBKZnoNECdrZ fNrQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533CegUI3gVc2FGZwPrkMV/ya1i2Ru61awIcedxK/KNE8cEi4Exj tc3K/Ve7ELDXO2Rtsf6qkxWUmAFJ4kPlozvjCheoaQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJc4PkbOmt8cgSJuFeo9YHlC8svngkeMc5FshbKIizYCUchTiiA5bLdSXkkv7I4QljC8sTMxvhfaNJxUNq4dQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:b0e3:: with SMTP id h3mr2220274ljl.426.1599162414897; Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200830154615.6CECEF4076B@rfc-editor.org> <BN7PR11MB2547CB85EBCF595FEE42A340CF510@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <6C4649AD-EB18-47E6-A5EA-440910977A26@fugue.com> <BN7PR11MB254709039DF02A88173AA96CCF2C0@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <AF158680-0083-463B-9C52-141B17B5613C@fugue.com> <BN7PR11MB2547770FEDCEB3A47057FB7CCF2C0@BN7PR11MB2547.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAJgLMKvK8fi+C2Aq0-xGP2wpJdUNqQn1eoVNauH-YMiGr3AtaQ@mail.gmail.com> <3059.1599162178@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <3059.1599162178@localhost>
From: Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2020 15:46:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CAJgLMKsPvqu-A0qnJH68=7v8rLUgvjhTN=1xcBraBis1S6Wgug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, "tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com" <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, "msiodelski@gmail.com" <msiodelski@gmail.com>, "Andrew Yourtchenko (ayourtch)" <ayourtch@cisco.com>, "jiangsheng@huawei.com" <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, "ek.ietf@gmail.com" <ek.ietf@gmail.com>, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, "fhamme@united-internet.de" <fhamme@united-internet.de>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000adb11005ae6e03e4"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/n5nSmE4OxmYufJvfN_6XxLBSXUQ>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 12:47:54 -0700
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8415 (6269)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Sep 2020 19:46:59 -0000

On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 3:43 PM Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
wrote:

>
> Timothy Winters <tim@qacafe.com> wrote:
>     > IPv6 Ready DHCPv6 Logo has never had a test for this, so I have no
> idea
>     > what the support is for general DHCPv6 Clients/Servers.
>
> To be clear, you don't test clients or servers for this, but...
>
Correct.

>
>     > At QACafe we see about 50% of the Home Gateways support it as we
> have a
>     > test for verifying it.
>
> I guess the home gateway is using this as a DHCPv6 client on it's WAN side?
> Or?   so there must be some server that supports it, or is it always your
> compliance test server that answers?
>
DHCP Client on the WAN side using a test tool.  No Interoperability.

>
> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
>            Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
>