Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in draft-aboba-dhc-domsearch-06.txt

Ralph Droms <rdroms@cisco.com> writes:
> At 07:00 AM 9/26/2001 -0700, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> > > Main item is that it has a normative reference to
> > >
> > > > [7]  Lemon, T., "Encoding Long DHCP Options", Internet draft (work in
> > > >      progress), draft-ietf-dhc-concat-01.txt, July 2001.
> > >
> > > so these two document should go together.
> >
> >Not sure the reference is normative. This option can use the long option
> >encoding if available, but doesn't require it.

> Agreed; in fact, I think you could eliminate references to
> the long option encoding draft w/o harming your spec...

This make sense to me. I will note, however, that current wording in
the concat draft could be interpret to suggest that it's intended for
future options and maybe less so for existing options. If the intent
is in fact that it the concat draft should apply to *all* DHCP
options, then taking out the reference would be fine.

If that is the intent, I'll go ahead and start the IETF last call on
domsearch.

Thomas

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg