Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Mon, 10 September 2012 19:37 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6237D11E808E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:37:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.047, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id i7bIK2VGzbiI for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:37:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og123.obsmtp.com (exprod7og123.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.24]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD1E411E808A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:37:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob123.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUE5Bihjvi/UkbGw5zsQlwg7QzxmY7IQ3@postini.com; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:37:46 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD989128012 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C26419005C for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:00:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Mon, 10 Sep 2012 12:00:31 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02
Thread-Index: AQHNdvzipwaJ7NUE4EeU+hu4IXKgZZeElHiA
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:00:30 +0000
Message-ID: <470B56BA-429C-4D50-9056-B9F9178EC72A@nominum.com>
References: <1939A7BF-5F90-4801-9956-A21161F1B024@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <1939A7BF-5F90-4801-9956-A21161F1B024@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <12095050C8627F4986F8F88DE3EAF2AD@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-client-id-02
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 19:37:48 -0000

On Aug 10, 2012, at 9:34 AM, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com> wrote:
> The authors have requested a working group last call for this draft.   This is the document that clarifies the use of the DHCP client identifier by DHCP servers, particularly in cases where chaddr is zero.   Please review the draft and indicate on the mailing list whether you support its advancement or oppose its advancement.

This draft passed the working group last call with substantial review, at least five participants in favor and nobody opposed.   I will be writing up a shepherd doc and sending it to the IESG.

Thanks!