IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation - src LL vs GUA

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 18 October 2017 17:55 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B84CA13300C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4CJtaoRuygwq for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:55:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F2566132C2A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id o135so6938675itb.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=NcfoySVKw7mgpMxG3Ga0WwTWuMUPQ3+gFpFVgATWhMc=; b=gINyWkDeVIXvMU1vkn1Ev/kpWlOe0dJrOBeh4QkBkvaN2uk6g91ZQvmgMfUTXcUhMr VPl4x07n4DYGEOGQOXEgo5LZEPnxV+qHulyZCGtvixwJ9RLxSZXkwL4x8dbWHU7qIiqU K7NGudC96e571U/cUvTQAmtOQU1Oyfa3+y8WQ5u/Nej4xVNyo/73VBkWZ57sLYsSxC1J UXRBIHyD8yNr7fmQZUw4LegELF+K4aVEX5in9bqqn5Uy3Q38beuTvrj4/slemJ3JgSg2 hcvyLwndF5hzoaU3VKXxKrQrHnOXbQ/8sb3FA25FeUuCF28PhARaQSHEBS2d/uBlfwoZ 3F+w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=NcfoySVKw7mgpMxG3Ga0WwTWuMUPQ3+gFpFVgATWhMc=; b=UZ78Ex6f1sqAgjcvKeKdFtqH5ZojECKBFGsje1ReVHoIBJ8/qqmc1v8WGkcGkloItj GUElTFO58VNOwguqMyTj0km0kgSJyPQv8a6DKmobNA5faio/WbGsfTsQ0N0q5OWYPLD4 8yLbt2epJozMPx7ffBecNFZvTzutkCJtaqknr6iia+/WwNOxVlLzEK6Fqp69mesACXoW pUjZM0b7yYk3hl1kBeiRNt/SFAOcFUbEyMsoeIjsChvoNMdTZ5B37Q50WEZRp1R8wqab jujOBjOgwyGU7tQ1/Ezc+BV0Pi8CKMWPZnPYoYjlAVnmCBBQ3ga1DzqC73LsxZD2hysV ShNw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaUCITnEmpqfI9bySdJ1DzwTxMm3vRRrCiCsAJD9JMVtp1PZet0z 0CgiMxnjgqhQx7rrpxUch3pSjg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RDsmI4z8L3rHhDB3bDnUir7q2waYe+NTAXbdtbLjpdAIsd5rGvV2ew3Bn1SivsBxY1eXFWQA==
X-Received: by 10.36.91.138 with SMTP id g132mr10379940itb.33.1508349342290; Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.19.0.235] ([75.104.72.60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p15sm6623723itc.41.2017.10.18.10.55.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:55:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <71C2ED41-43A2-45DD-AFC8-A58C9E794FE9@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_160F8249-4F90-4D66-ABDB-DF54F855DDCF"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 10:55:26 -0700
In-Reply-To: <eccd5dd2-3542-fdbc-89a2-7d13d563163d@gmail.com>
Cc: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <149869621720.6575.278128190348174876@ietfa.amsl.com> <08e4e953-3a68-d6cb-6066-f60514ef0ac5@gmail.com> <3285281858d043649d507b6bda7b8646@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <1f94b780-59c1-42ce-936d-0c8a71143444@gmail.com> <37917a26062f4e4c9715d324604e4d01@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <d944ac55-d67d-d7d4-8eeb-f60438fdda2d@gmail.com> <35558A79-C176-4D71-9E91-4BDB19DDD006@cisco.com> <67ba54d2-d53f-82bf-93c9-1b92631ef4e8@gmail.com> <86409a9acb7846ddbdff42c58328e7d6@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <eccd5dd2-3542-fdbc-89a2-7d13d563163d@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/o0Za4_SEpVxy1Haq_GwD4_NpG8U>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation - src LL vs GUA
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2017 17:55:45 -0000

On Oct 18, 2017, at 10:42 AM, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> But I need guidance to the following question: if the Client sends a Solicit with a LL in src, MUST the Server reply to it?  (yes/no is the needed guidance).

I don't know what the spec says off the top of my head, but if the server doesn't respond, the client will keep asking, so this seems like a bad idea.

> I explain why: about 4 distinct clients use LL in src.  If I want these clients to use GUA then I must delete the LL from the interface.

The server not responding is not going to help with this.

v2.2.1 | Report a Bug | By Email