IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Fri, 19 November 2010 09:28 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1140228C0CF for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:28:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cJ8f4lj7UNwz for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:28:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4298D28C0E4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from source ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTOZDdKiNiS1EEnA5rMmrYGKGDIQkjzEj@postini.com; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:29:25 PST
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (webmail.nominum.com [64.89.228.50]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "webmail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E7D1B8AF7; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:29:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.1.10.14] (173.162.214.218) by exchange-01.win.nominum.com (64.89.228.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:29:24 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CE64047.6010605@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 04:29:22 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-ID: <B1C35A1D-F333-4906-BFC1-D77D91383462@nominum.com>
References: <BC2DA9BF-7814-4505-8AEA-7513094490AC@nominum.com> <4CE64047.6010605@cisco.com>
To: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:28:37 -0000

On Nov 19, 2010, at 4:15 AM, Eliot Lear wrote:
> It seems a bit odd to have such a call when an author has said they're
> rewriting the draft.

So you're against adopting a draft as a working group work item because it needs to have work done on it?   Can you walk me through your reasoning in a bit more detail?

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email