[dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
"Vijayabhaskar A K" <vijayak@india.hp.com> Tue, 15 January 2002 14:41 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA25048 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:41:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id JAA08333 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:41:51 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA07904; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:36:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA07847 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:35:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palrel11.hp.com (palrel11.hp.com [156.153.255.246]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA24755 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 09:35:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hpuxsrv.india.hp.com (hpuxsrv.india.hp.com [15.10.45.132]) by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2696E00328 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 06:34:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nt4147 (nt4147.india.hp.com [15.10.41.47]) by hpuxsrv.india.hp.com with SMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id UAA25407 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:00:45 +0530 (IST)
Reply-To: vijayak@india.hp.com
From: Vijayabhaskar A K <vijayak@india.hp.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2002 20:05:56 +0530
Message-ID: <001301c19dd1$f1acbd80$2f290a0f@india.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-reply-to: <Pine.OSF.3.95.1020115035846.16623B-100000@www.bit-net.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Importance: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I have gone through the dhcpv6 22 spec. I felt that, static route option (option 33 in RFC 2132) is missing. which is useful for routing. Can we include this option also in the spec? thanks and regards Vijay _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vijayabhaskar A K
- RE: (ngtrans) RE: [dhcwg] Questions about DHCPv6 … Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: (ngtrans) RE: [dhcwg] Questions about DHCPv6 … Jim Bound
- Re: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vijayabhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vijayabhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vernon Schryver
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Vijayabhaskar A K
- RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6 Martin Stiemerling