IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt

Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com> Fri, 19 November 2010 09:14 UTC

Return-Path: <lear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087873A68B8 for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:14:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -109.922
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-109.922 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.677, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4jOpqM2l4f9s for <dhcwg@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:14:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ams-iport-1.cisco.com (ams-iport-1.cisco.com [144.254.224.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DFE73A67EA for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 01:14:47 -0800 (PST)
Authentication-Results: ams-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsgEANzO5UyQ/khMgWdsb2JhbACDRJ8VFQEBFiIioTKKNpB5gSKDNnMEils
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,221,1288569600"; d="scan'208";a="69631027"
Received: from ams-core-3.cisco.com ([144.254.72.76]) by ams-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 19 Nov 2010 09:15:36 +0000
Received: from ams3-vpn-dhcp8079.cisco.com (ams3-vpn-dhcp8079.cisco.com [10.61.95.142]) by ams-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oAJ9Fane028062; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:15:36 GMT
Message-ID: <4CE64047.6010605@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:15:51 +0100
From: Eliot Lear <lear@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
References: <BC2DA9BF-7814-4505-8AEA-7513094490AC@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <BC2DA9BF-7814-4505-8AEA-7513094490AC@nominum.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-yeh-dhc-dhcpv6-prefix-pool-opt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 09:14:49 -0000

It seems a bit odd to have such a call when an author has said they're
rewriting the draft.

-1.

Eliot

On 11/19/10 3:48 AM, Ted Lemon wrote:
> It occurs to me that people might be skimming the subject line and missing the content, so I'll restate this in a formal message: we had a call for adoption for this draft in Beijing, and the consensus in the meeting was that there was interest and this was work the wg should do.
>
> So to complete the process I'm putting forth a formal call for adoption.   If you think this is worth doing, please say so.   If you think it's not, please say so.   If we don't hear anything at all by next Thursday, we will go with the room consensus, which was to adopt.
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email