[dhcwg] Maximum message size interpretation
Bud Millwood <budm@weird-solutions.com> Fri, 15 February 2002 10:43 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA01725 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:43:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id FAA12197 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:43:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA11087; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:21:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id FAA11065 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:21:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: from fep01-svc.swip.net (fep01.swip.net [130.244.199.129]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA01453 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 05:21:24 -0500 (EST)
Received: from there ([193.12.201.10]) by fep01-svc.swip.net with SMTP id <20020215102055.NDNZ23536.fep01-svc.swip.net@there> for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:20:55 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
From: Bud Millwood <budm@weird-solutions.com>
Reply-To: Bud Millwood <budm@weird-solutions.com>
Organization: Weird Solutions, Inc.
To: DHCP discussion list <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2002 11:25:31 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <20020215102055.NDNZ23536.fep01-svc.swip.net@there>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id FAA11066
Subject: [dhcwg] Maximum message size interpretation
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
When a client gives my server the maximum message size it can receive, should I interpret that as the total IP packet size the client can receive or just the size of the DHCP portion? From the description of this option, it appears that I should interpret the value as the size of the entire IP packet the client can receive. In other words, should I subtract IP and UDP header sizes from a client's Maximum Message Size value? - Bud Bud Millwood Weird Solutions, Inc. http://www.weird-solutions.com tel: +46 70 566 7803 fax: +46 8 758 3687 mailto:budm@weird-solutions.com _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Maximum message size interpretation Bud Millwood
- Re: [dhcwg] Maximum message size interpretation Tobin Coziahr
- Re: [dhcwg] Maximum message size interpretation Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] Maximum message size interpretation Tobin Coziahr