Re: [dhcwg] 3315bis question: Changing default DUID to DUID-LL?

[Ted Lemon <[e-mail]>]

Hm, to be clear, the intention was that a large manufacturer of devices
might want their own number space, not that a large organization purchasing
heterogeneous devices might then generate DUIDs for those devices out of a
single enterprise number space.   I may have misunderstood what you were
suggesting.

On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Erik Kline <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hmm, that's not how I would have read that -EN section.  When I read
> "enterprise" I think more of "for guaranteed unique use within a
> private space" than "these are my unique numbers to give away to all
> my friends".
>
> I would never have guessed this use case was an intention (though of
> course it makes sense).
>
> On 24 May 2016 at 10:18, Ted Lemon <[e-mail]> wrote:
> > Yeah, but they don't do that, so it doesn't matter.  That _is_ why we
> came
> > up with DUID-EN, but as far as I can tell it was a flop. :(
> >
> >
> > On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:09 PM, Erik Kline <[e-mail]> wrote:
> >>
> >> >> It could also be edited for big orgs to use a Vendor-assigned unique
> ID
> >> >> based
> >> >> on Enterprise Number, which I'm pretty sure satisfied the
> provisioning
> >> >> case.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > I've never actually heard of anyone doing this, although I agree that
> >> > you
> >> > are correct in theory.   :)
> >>
> >> But might this solve your use case?  If the vendor got an enterprise
> >> number and each device was flashed with a unique DUID-EN that was also
> >> printed on the box...?
> >
> >
>