[dhcwg] Re: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server

"Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <paul@etri.re.kr> Mon, 07 June 2004 09:15 UTC

Received: from megatron.ietf.org (megatron.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA02927; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 05:15:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BXG8J-0000kx-SM; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:09:31 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BXG5s-0000GT-9q for dhcwg@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:07:00 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org []) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA02464 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 05:06:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org ([] helo=ietf-mx) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1BXG5p-0002L9-UY for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:06:58 -0400
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1BXG4r-0001zA-00 for dhcwg@ietf.org; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:05:57 -0400
Received: from pec.etri.re.kr ([]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1BXG3m-0001JN-00; Mon, 07 Jun 2004 05:04:51 -0400
Received: from paul3 (paul3.etri.re.kr []) by pec.etri.re.kr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i579LMvx028785; Mon, 7 Jun 2004 18:21:22 +0900 (KST)
Message-ID: <010501c44c6e$50f0ac00$c470fe81@etri.re.kr>
From: Jaehoon Paul Jeong <paul@etri.re.kr>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>, dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
References: <DAC3FCB50E31C54987CD10797DA511BA096341CF@WIN-MSG-10.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2004 18:03:34 +0900
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL,MIME_BASE64_LATIN, MIME_BASE64_TEXT autolearn=no version=2.60
Cc: V6OPS WG <v6ops@ops.ietf.org>, DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, IPv6 WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Satapati <satapati@cisco.com>
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: dhcwg.ietf.org
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0825089655=="
Sender: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org

Thanks for your good comments.

I agree with you at your two points.
Especially, number 2 is the opinion of your co-author, Suresh.
He will speak about your opinion.


>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Christian Huitema" <huitema@windows.microsoft.com>
>To: "Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <paul@etri.re.kr>; <dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu>
>Sent: Monday, June 07, 2004 1:28 PM
>Subject: RE: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server
>Two points:
>1) In the disadvantage of DHCPv6 section, you ought to mention that
>there is a ensure that the DHCP server always returns an up-to-date
>value for the address of the preferred recursive DNS server. In large
>networks, this is not trivial: the notion of which server is closest
>depends on routing configuration and on server status, all of which are
>dynamic. In contrast, the anycast approach guarantees that the request
>will reach the closest server.
>2) In the unmanaged case, you wrongly assume that case C is "like case
>A". In fact, it is more like case B: if a gateway provides IPv6
>connectivity by managing tunnels, then it is also supposed to provide
>access to a recursive DNS server.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jaehoon Paul Jeong
>> Sent: Sunday, June 06, 2004 8:57 PM
>> To: dnsop@lists.uoregon.edu
>> Cc: V6OPS WG; DHC WG; IPv6 DNS Configuration; IPv6 WG
>> Subject: Re: IPv6 Host Configuration of Recursive DNS Server
>> Hi all,
>> For 1 week, there have been no comments on our IPv6 DNS Configuraion.
>> Does it mean that there is no problem about this draft and it is ok to
>> request WGLC? :-)
>> Paul
dhcwg mailing list