Re: [dhcwg] RECONFIGURE Triggered by DHCPv6 Relay Agents (draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure)

Dear Andre,

I see the point. 

I updated the text accordingly. 

Thanks.

Cheers,
Med 

>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Andre Kostur [mailto:akostur@incognito.com] 
>Envoyé : vendredi 24 août 2012 17:48
>À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
>Cc : dhcwg@ietf.org
>Objet : Re: [dhcwg] RECONFIGURE Triggered by DHCPv6 Relay 
>Agents (draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure)
>
>Normally the server is being told administratively to reconfigure a
>client, and presumably which of the three methods to use.  This is
>just another form of that.   I could see it being changed to: the RA
>MAY supply an OPTION_RECONF_MSG, and if not supplied, the server may
>determine which form of Reconfigure to use.
>
>On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:35 AM,  <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>> Dear Andre,
>>
>> Please see inline.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Med
>>
>>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>De : Andre Kostur [mailto:akostur@incognito.com]
>>>Envoyé : vendredi 24 août 2012 17:17
>>>À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
>>>Cc : dhcwg@ietf.org
>>>Objet : Re: [dhcwg] RECONFIGURE Triggered by DHCPv6 Relay
>>>Agents (draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure)
>>>
>>>A question that popped into my mind is how does the server decide
>>>whether the client will be doing a Renew, Rebind, or
>>>Information-Request?  Perhaps the RA MUST supply an 
>OPTION_RECONF_MSG?
>>
>> Med: What I had initially in mind for this new message: is 
>to not require any change to the way RECONFIGURE is managed by 
>the server but only provide a signal to the DHCPv6 server to 
>issue one. Is there any particular reason you think the RA 
>should be involved in that process?
>>
>>>
>>>Also, is the RA expected to monitor the clients as to 
>whether they are
>>>reconfigure capable, or will the RA rely on the server to be watching
>>>that?
>>
>> Med: I would say no.
>>
>>    Do we want the server to be able to report back to the RA that
>>>the client cannot do Reconfigure?
>>
>> Med: I would say no.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:49 AM, 
><mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dear all,
>>>>
>>>> I submitted a new I-D defining a new message type to trigger
>>>a server to
>>>> issue a RECONFIGURE message when RSSO is used.
>>>>
>>>> The text is available at:
>>>>
>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-
>>>reconfigure
>>>>
>>>> Comments and suggestions are more than welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Med
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> dhcwg mailing list
>>>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>--
>>>Andre Kostur
>>>
>
>
>
>-- 
>Andre Kostur
>Senior Product Design Engineer
>P: 604-678-2864
>E: akostur@incognito.com
>Toll-Free: 1-800-877-1856
>
>
>F: 604-678-2864
>VoIP: sip:864@sip.incognito.com
>