IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Fri, 31 July 2015 14:28 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5831A8900 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:28:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JSl65scDkicx for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-2.cisco.com (alln-iport-2.cisco.com [173.37.142.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C6A1A88FF for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 07:28:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1011; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1438352915; x=1439562515; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=pp8rKj1r6WaM8Zv4BvJsL8XaOzSOZKVlGM9M/LI4ffo=; b=Ai2qET6w8UC31qEDkBUKcBnW93BGgPpN2CbP4FWIATULOajMyw4Lhur6 QfvlegFQh4vJbAfz+dk7cV2bc+AM186Fpb4do+FX7EPGqY8RMg289b/Li NQcXtBAXScPF4TPCygeaXevH4kd0dy4xqy4NRp2bBBAEJPovSqoOuwOay o=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AlAwCDhbtV/4sNJK1bgxqBQ7wtCYd9AoExOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJAEBBDo0GwIBCA4UFBAyJQEBBAEaiCbHOQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEZi06BPYMZOIMYgRQBBJR4AY4PhCCPc4NlJoI/gT6CN4EEAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,584,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="173792340"
Received: from alln-core-6.cisco.com ([173.36.13.139]) by alln-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jul 2015 14:28:34 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by alln-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6VESXYV008344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:28:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com ([169.254.8.177]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 09:28:33 -0500
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)
Thread-Index: AdDKIzbWOiOjvN2OTF2YqQPPD6D7kQBoD3SAAAoOwSA=
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:28:32 +0000
Message-ID: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB93E65@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CB90384@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <55BB7FF9.1060600@si6networks.com>
In-Reply-To: <55BB7FF9.1060600@si6networks.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.198]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/p_o6zVoANId2DrX_lwO-rpZo2iA>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] IETF-93 Follow Up - draft-ietf-dhc-stable-privacy-addresses (Respond by Aug 11, 2015)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:28:35 -0000

WG: Please respond to the question at hand - if you do not indicate YOUR support for this work continuing, we will be forced to drop this as a WG work item.

Fernando:

We obviously assume that the authors are in favor of advancing your work.

But we haven't yet seen sufficient support for continuing this work. And unless we do, there's little point in doing so as it obviously does not have WG consensus to move forward.

Actually, my proposal to drop this work was to assure that if people felt it was important, they WOULD respond. Just asking a vague "do you support this work" tends to get little response.


Anyway, we will wait until the follow up period expires and make a decision then based on the feedback from the IETF-93 meeting and comments on the mailing list.

If there isn't sufficient support in the WG, we will mark the document as a "dead" WG document; and you can always continue the work as an individual submission to the IETF.


- Bernie

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email