[dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC7227 (4028)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 27 June 2014 04:36 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EBC71B2A92; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.853
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.853 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PD5Ix09HFrMB; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F3C1B2A7F; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 197761801C1; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
To: dwing@cisco.com, dhankins@google.com, tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com, msiodelski@gmail.com, jiangsheng@huawei.com, suresh.krishnan@ericsson.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1005:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20140627043430.197761801C1@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 21:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/phgIi5xHWwrfWcY3yZf9YaWSKV8
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 04:20:17 -0700
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org, ted.lemon@nominum.com, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: [dhcwg] [Errata Verified] RFC7227 (4028)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2014 04:36:13 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC7227,
"Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=7227&eid=4028

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>;
Date Reported: 2014-06-26
Verified by: Ted Lemon (IESG)

Section: 5.1

Original Text
-------------
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          option-code          |           option-len          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                         ipv6-address                          |
   |                                                               |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                         ipv6-address                          |
   |                                                               |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                              ...                              |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                   Figure 1: Option with IPv6 Addresses

Corrected Text
--------------
    0                   1                   2                   3
    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |          option-code          |           option-len          |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   |                                                               |
   |                         ipv6-address                          |
   |                                                               |
   |                                                               |
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
   :                              ...                              :
   +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

                   Figure 1: Option with IPv6 Addresses


Notes
-----
Original text shows two IPv6 addresses are required in an option.  However, it should be possible to send just one IPv6 address.

--------------------------------------
RFC7227 (draft-ietf-dhc-option-guidelines-17)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Guidelines for Creating New DHCPv6 Options
Publication Date    : May 2014
Author(s)           : D. Hankins, T. Mrugalski, M. Siodelski, S. Jiang, S. Krishnan
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Dynamic Host Configuration
Area                : Internet
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG