IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt

"Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com> Thu, 16 February 2017 22:38 UTC

Return-Path: <volz@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461B0129577 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:38:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KS1zBz5-9xLC for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:38:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27F47124281 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 14:38:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13346; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1487284737; x=1488494337; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=60MbhKrmQc9HaCGrE+xr2SKWgEcs+Bp0FWiKqXcBKVc=; b=O/STn6isvuNvD8KchZ0ZWYfufTQUrMnvDKe9NYcYhqBxeqNm8f1uBPhO 9N0Qn9Sek09U+1X+hcVhCJcYTDMJ7atMn7JdFlZYTqDgH2C6TEYDjmaiW vSSgdkD90wXjvl7BU+vcx8kjKCYNER1xUQ/0KWKCsK6YWyrBs7uMGNVDO 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BwAQBiKaZY/5FdJa1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm9iYYEJB4NSigiSD5AHhSyCDC6FdAIagXY/GAECAQEBAQEBAWIohHABAQECAiMKSgIQAgEGAg4DBAEBKAMCAgIwFAkIAgQBDQUIiWQOknudWIIli1UBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYBYs7hQqCUIJfBZt/AZINkQ+TFwEfOIEAURWHAXUBiSmBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,169,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="386609029"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Feb 2017 22:38:56 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (xch-aln-003.cisco.com [173.36.7.13]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v1GMcuOS002197 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:38:56 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com (173.36.7.13) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:38:55 -0600
Received: from xch-aln-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) by XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com ([173.36.7.13]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 16 Feb 2017 16:38:55 -0600
From: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt
Thread-Index: AQHSb9dh9mAfGPV9aE2109Imxv8IT6FqmOCwgAHRRkA=
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:38:55 +0000
Message-ID: <9d9d50b20005459aafffcd8f64bfb281@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com>
References: <148455739520.22478.14651605359463322132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJ3w4NdCk8CBfNagcXT_VW_50+=xK=N7aB5HHqqn3stMt7Gy-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqf_AP9w1Bh_5kSB4YkLaV9XJ1tngufAiOMxVqQLwMruNA@mail.gmail.com> <aba52c11e462426bb3cbf66fcdca7783@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqcG004FuUkKa0Xk1AiOo-bO4aHweYDpxMeeg+_=dSK6FQ@mail.gmail.com> <5c9ed55cfdc94456baf19740ba62910c@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqeshAHmvGukto+PKs_skVPF5bnukvw8+5_04YEx_6m_sQ@mail.gmail.com> <ABDD8B01-EC93-4ADD-AF59-57332A9C255E@fugue.com>
In-Reply-To: <ABDD8B01-EC93-4ADD-AF59-57332A9C255E@fugue.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.98.1.204]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_9d9d50b20005459aafffcd8f64bfb281XCHALN003ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/poj8OX6u64lg0q7CfVLzrcqS5dU>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2017 22:38:59 -0000

I presented about resurrecting draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate at IETF-97 (see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/slides/slides-97-dhc-resurrect-draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-agentopt-delegate-00.pdf).

And the conclusion then was (see https://www.ietf.org/proceedings/97/minutes/minutes-97-dhc-00.txt):

The discussion gravitated towards not resurrecting until the sedhcpv6
I-D progresses further. We will reevaluate this once sedhcpv6 is done.


-          Bernie

From: dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Lemon
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 1:49 PM
To: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt

On Feb 15, 2017, at 1:32 PM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp<mailto:jinmei@wide.ad.jp>> wrote:
I personally don't think it a blocking issue for sedhcpv6, but, of
course, the wg should decide it.

It definitely isn't a blocking issue, but Fred is right that if we are going ahead with encryption-only, which I agree is the right move, we need to do this work as well.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email