[dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-07: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Wed, 10 June 2020 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051923A0F8F; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 01:04:40 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign@ietf.org, dhc-chairs@ietf.org, dhcwg@ietf.org, Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>, Ian Farrer <ianfarrer@gmx.com>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.3.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <159177627956.30352.2044808070251836429@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 01:04:40 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/qPDv1SasDBfTbRsE8calhYG9xPI>
Subject: [dhcwg] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 08:04:40 -0000

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-dhc-mac-assign-07: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


Section 1:
* "... -  more details are in Appendix A." -- This should be its own sentence.

Section 3:
* "... typically 6 octets long." -- s/6/six/ (and for all numbers below 10 in
prose; more below) * "... (extra) addresses/ A single address ..." -- that
slash should be a period

Section 4.3:
* "... may specify a specific ..." -- maybe "include a specific"?
* "... with offered address or addresses." -- put "an" before "address"
* Can we just refer to Figure 1 over in RFC 8415 rather than copying it here?
* "An administrator may make the address assignment permanent by ..." -- this
is already stated earlier in the same section

Section 5:
* In the second paragraph, two consecutive sentences start with "Therefore".  I
suggest just dropping the first instance.

Section 8:
* "... expand the address block - once ..." -- make that an em dash, or a new

Section 10.1:
* "A 4-octet field ..." -- suggest "four-octet" (three instances in this
section, more in 10.2)

Section 10.2:
* I suggest that naming the IANA registry here is sufficient; the URL isn't
needed.  (What if it were to change?) * "A 2-octet field ..." -- suggest

Section 11:
* "Ethernet / IEEE ..." -- somewhere earlier in the document, the liberal
spacing here caused funny wrapping to occur, so I suggest "Ethernet/IEEE"

Section 12:
* Same comment about the registry URLs here as above.