Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-10.txt
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 01 April 2014 14:49 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C9111A06F4 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 07:49:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T-sVsApcdU8a for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 07:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DACFC1A06C0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 07:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.4]) by omfedm14.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id CA76422C243; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:49:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH51.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.31]) by omfedm08.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id AD8F4238081; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:49:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.11]) by PUEXCH51.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.31]) with mapi; Tue, 1 Apr 2014 16:49:34 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 16:49:32 +0200
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-10.txt
Thread-Index: Ac9NuQeKN7jmedqXS0a33bLy9d2/sgAAIX8w
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36F54484B06@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <20140401074050.4622.92489.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36F544848AE@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <657EBF08-AD6C-4E76-AF8B-DADF707B6720@nominum.com> <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36F54484AFA@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr> <B5DDE7C1-071E-4781-AA0C-A91AB7F81441@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <B5DDE7C1-071E-4781-AA0C-A91AB7F81441@nominum.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.4.1.70017
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/qSVeJWUUV0FkYzF30PlrC7IUCr8
Cc: DHC WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp@tools.ietf.org>, "pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification - draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-10.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Apr 2014 14:49:40 -0000
That's make sense too. Thanks. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Ted Lemon [mailto:ted.lemon@nominum.com] >Envoyé : mardi 1 avril 2014 16:45 >À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed IMT/OLN >Cc : pcp-chairs@tools.ietf.org; draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp@tools.ietf.org; DHC WG >Objet : Re: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-pcp-dhcp-10.txt > >On Apr 1, 2014, at 10:41 AM, <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> ><mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote: >> [Med] This text seems OK to me. I have only one minor comment is that >this is not specific to OPTION_V6_PCP_SERVER but can apply each time we >need to provide a list of IP addresses to a dual-stack host connected via >an IPv6-only connectivity using an encapsulation mode. I' suggest to remove >the sentence starting with " This behavior is ...". > >What I am specifically trying to avoid is DHCPv6 servers simply doing A >queries for all FQDN resolutions and returning IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses >in all cases. This would be disastrous. If some future option requires >this functionality, it should refer either to this specification, or to >3315bis, assuming that 3315bis documents this capability. But it >absolutely cannot be enabled by default on all DHCPv6 options.
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification - draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification - draft-ietf… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification - draft-ietf… Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] New Version Notification - draft-ietf… mohamed.boucadair