Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 and IPv6ND

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 15 November 2017 02:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9CB81205F0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:49:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3QjlvgasD8D9 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:49:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x235.google.com (mail-pg0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2E0D1201F2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x235.google.com with SMTP id l19so14356743pgo.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:49:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=QSoaZHyUj8S8QDpRMsl0uGPbZRnBqt61iWxbgLbKGBc=; b=wQ1hNaCIwgBZbW9coNX9t8uwhfVCACq4Z187m21lyt3wN7BY5ZocUR6dPqxkxDRpx4 R4mbA7l2P15M/k4zjxAQTgl1Cb4FH33Ovpz6SVTGyVf9UEz1nmSZ9CAA+h6wc9UE/Jpb m2biCNlLd8kWMODL/CUzkwtNtUaHHP7qsER34VOD/XM4J4qXz5oKT1C9mVUVBmBMuUGi +CrYFK3r+WqSE8cX9f5iB27++Kir+M0nXUPlctPlC7kwfWm67zi1ks+VzbWHuszXQln/ vZDJ37F45ghebmQk+FdrUrq/B4jGgicVPs7zhePjIFBXFVINTKkhXv+6VzasqTZYHhev YKOA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=QSoaZHyUj8S8QDpRMsl0uGPbZRnBqt61iWxbgLbKGBc=; b=hFSKHyTVjg+2a+qMAZ36ZrHV2AgTkUnZSDqoa+PV57NHNImh4S37EEsMRYYuWg+DdK iSzkjDVYZqXl985iQ4ML107wpGI9751NYvIqOFpplKyfx8qJoaz9dN4O7D0uJU9/Czcz y0NcZ9KvH7d1RqPgSg1OT39ESzCbf3yO//A7C6Cj5O70jLX3OvZhsw2feNdqJUpJ5JhQ nFgWLGfM1F/bmLQnWo5kDaZ5wEMVhe2y22L0TzAkQU/D4BjmHbCUXF7ishjgJlFKrwXe VrpnSaPpEF97YV8IBlDHFZFbxl5aSgjpqucv6LRskHfyjM6EgivPpSMd0QS3Q28E436Q O+Bg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX4Ysow+OoEeGKlHtAJD8Ya0D+klUUrUUADftufPzWvDeMNtKf88 K+2Nbt2mCBQwmy5pQQsKmdrg2g==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYarqpM0ZEhesJwY0KWttyLa+FV879k0ld9SxCBuUpDE+ljiNKmPu7oqHGM8KeTNM21qOcFtw==
X-Received: by 10.84.143.68 with SMTP id 62mr14443743ply.315.1510714180350; Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:49:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:67c:370:1998:15c6:86bd:9d6:7dd3? ([2001:67c:370:1998:15c6:86bd:9d6:7dd3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l22sm46251977pfk.45.2017.11.14.18.49.39 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 18:49:39 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <89CE6E3F-7501-4A8D-9A1B-5638A8845E7D@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_EE2AC7D7-7D9F-4D4B-B5EF-5FC0D7B92E00"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 10:49:37 +0800
In-Reply-To: <68a1f0db-58d3-fe0e-8169-127c0b629df1@gmail.com>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
References: <cf2e41a05fd742a3b576ee317c5392f6@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <E94F8CD6-EC4E-4B61-92B6-99FBD1D494A4@fugue.com> <8d935331012947aa942e8dc2a48d889f@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <54D1B686-A5FA-42A0-8A57-067562313488@fugue.com> <38ef2544-df5c-4677-ffaa-7b084eb300fa@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1k7CBvTOHFFoNeS6TMq_dkvSQTJ4TXR=Yt8S-6p--eabg@mail.gmail.com> <e4df5049-2548-6762-994d-a12c8f663e59@gmail.com> <8E4C374A-DA6D-4FAB-AAEA-7EB4A2A655D8@fugue.com> <68a1f0db-58d3-fe0e-8169-127c0b629df1@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/r7FIMEDgcnzYkNgmuRVDZY01a4I>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCPv6 and IPv6ND
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 02:49:43 -0000

On Nov 15, 2017, at 10:33 AM, Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:
> They dont understand that nobody asks them to implement DHCPv6 on the modem.  The DHCPv6 happens between ARM and the cellular operator.  Both sides are ready, yet the middle (the 'modem') blocks 547.
> 
> That's the problem.

I'm confused.   I thought you were saying that we can't do ND, but it sounds like what we can't do is DHCP.   And the reason we can't do it is a misconfigured middlebox, not a protocol issue.