RE: [dhcwg] Internet Drafts to be reviewed by the dhc WG

Hi:

Both of these drafts are IDENTICAL except that for the name of the
draft. I presume one should have been a DHCPv4 option
(draft-tran-midcom-dhcp-option-00.txt) and the other a DHCPv6 option?

- Bernie

-----Original Message-----
From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
Ralph Droms
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 1:24 PM
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Cc: margaret@thingmagic.com; narten@us.ibm.com; Melinda Shore
Subject: [dhcwg] Internet Drafts to be reviewed by the dhc WG

There are a couple of Internet Drafts under review by the midcom WG that
specify new DHCP options:

draft-tran-midcom-dhcp-option-00.txt
draft-tran-midcom-dhcpv6-option-00.txt

Based on our current charter, the dhc WG should consider collaborating
with the midcom WG on the review of these specifications; specifically,
the dhc WG should review the syntax of the options for adherence to DHCP
requirements and consistency with other DHCP options, while the midcom
WG will review the semantics associated with the options.

Is there any objection to taking on this review as a dhc WG work item,
pending acceptance of the documents by the midcom WG?  Note that the
drafts themselves will appear as midcom WG documents (if taken on by the
midcom WG).

- Ralph

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg