Re: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized?
Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Wed, 26 February 2003 22:25 UTC
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29774 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:25:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id h1QMYrp17001 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:34:53 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1QMYrp16998 for <dhcwg-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:34:53 -0500
Received: from www1.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29761 for <dhcwg-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:24:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from www1.ietf.org (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1QMXJp16930; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:33:19 -0500
Received: from ietf.org (odin.ietf.org [132.151.1.176]) by www1.ietf.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h1QMWmp16870 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:32:48 -0500
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA29630 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:22:35 -0500 (EST)
Received: from nominum.com (dsl093-187-232.chi2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.187.232]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.6/8.6.11) with ESMTP id h1QMNcJ19485 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:23:38 -0600 (CST)
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:26:29 -0600
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v551)
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <A1DDC8E21094D511821C00805F6F706B067F5A3E@eamrcnt715.exu.ericsson.se>
Message-Id: <59ABE704-49D9-11D7-AF3B-00039367340A@nominum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.551)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> And, ARP refreshes only work if the two devices (access + client) are > on the > same physical network segment. That's I think one other reason ARP > isn't a good > solution for this. The other thing that I recall, that I left out of my original message, is that it can be handy for concentrators to have access to the relay agent information option associated with a particular IP address, so that they can know on which circuit to send a packet to that client, again without checking all the circuits to see to which circuit the client is connected. Thomas, I don't know how you'd solve this problem without DHCP. As we get away from DHCP to access control, I agree that it could be a problem, but the basic function of this draft isn't access control - it's querying the DHCP server. I don't know why there's even a reason to mention access control in the problem statement. _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Mark Stapp
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Mark Stapp
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Steve Gonczi
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Woundy, Richard
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Erik Nordmark
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Leasequery: should it be standardized? Woundy, Richard