IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Wed, 19 July 2017 09:57 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2B7129AD1 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DSAR6FOyFWDg for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:57:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B90DB126C0F for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 02:57:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v6J9vonc036896; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:57:50 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 5ED912066CC; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:57:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C91D201313; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:57:50 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [132.166.84.51] ([132.166.84.51]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v6J9vn6q005201; Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:57:50 +0200
To: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Cc: Vízdal Aleš <ales.vizdal@t-mobile.cz>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
References: <149869621720.6575.278128190348174876@ietfa.amsl.com> <37917a26062f4e4c9715d324604e4d01@XCH-ALN-003.cisco.com> <5fdc7054-7012-30ee-dec7-618f3cd3646f@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=8Aibz0qWib=RiCr510i6DeGGZSOFNnWG0h-mguUzgqA@mail.gmail.com> <6f811cd2-61f1-05c2-1ede-b6933fa1dbb3@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1=0_U3en3zAJbO0fMxKv32iFYLcTVqn6bO5zm6XjT3+iQ@mail.gmail.com> <0ea332fc-79a0-4ae9-50fc-465f2389157a@gmail.com> <CC675F8E-BCA7-4937-8A26-A5CA227C56C8@t-mobile.cz> <243e84a0-2804-d1a3-2d9d-4969c83e81df@gmail.com> <6606c293c34d405e8153273a4bdeb357@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <CAPt1N1nCjEB5vgejn9CjO6y9PU_WqBn41PpvofF1h_ATv3_GmA@mail.gmail.com> <bc49c4e4567d4425af4f83e7136817aa@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <CAPt1N1kUGmp-87MeV0kf9rfGp85ux8RNpENCL1pknybWs_MPNQ@mail.gmail.com> <28fcee88f7354927b521c822b50277c6@srvhk403.rdm.cz> <CAPt1N1mt51V4aHTs46S71qRpoz0iwpAyxq0_YqHX=AtRDa+x-g@mail.gmail.com> <56aee165-9dd3-7633-a3bb-9d62b469b48a@gmail.com> <CAPt1N1mDcKo5G19t38HcNh_WErYg8n0yswy-Wk7QCL26mpwFeg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <bf368c54-29a5-3384-00ea-f397d0213939@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 11:57:49 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.2.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAPt1N1mDcKo5G19t38HcNh_WErYg8n0yswy-Wk7QCL26mpwFeg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/s78V987rxWMRn_UbWIudOPVlG5I>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-dhc-rfc3315bis-09.txt - questions about Solicit Prefix Delegation
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 09:57:56 -0000

Le 19/07/2017 à 11:52, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> No worries.   Have you tried compiling with USE_SOCKETS?   Does that 
> produce the same result?

Yes and results are different but still not satisfactorily overall.

(FWIW #define USE_SOCKETS 1 goes in build/includes/config.h)

Alex

> 
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 11:10 AM, Alexandre Petrescu 
> <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     Ted,
> 
>     Let me explain.  I no longer have a request for the spec 3315bis.  Sorry
>     for the intrusion.
> 
>     Le 18/07/2017 à 11:07, Ted Lemon a écrit :
> 
>         He later said that he'd observed this behavior when using the
>         ISC DHCP client.   My theory is that this is an artifact of the
>         way the ISC DHCP client transmits packets on the network, and
>         not a problem with the tunneling protocol.   It would be nice to
>         validate that conjecture.
> 
> 
>     We work on this conjencture, but it takes time, because it involves many
>     people, I am the only who speaks, and some times wrongly.  Now I prefer
>     to stay silent until I get some resolution to talk about.
> 
>     Until then, all I can say is that I have packet dumps that show
>     encapsulation, and ICMP hoplimit exceeded, and that the DHCP Solicit had
>     hoplimit 1.  It is however not clear whether or not that's anybody's
>     fault.
> 
>     This is not a matter of someone's fault; the goal is to make it work.
> 
>     I am sorry for the confusion this may have created.
> 
>     Alex
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email