Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Wed, 15 February 2017 18:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7C69129B21 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:49:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vmcB7B4IDSBr for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:49:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x236.google.com (mail-qt0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8245129B22 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:49:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x236.google.com with SMTP id v23so145302749qtb.0 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:49:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=JHdtkd0isnlFZVszr8HC1JsOnUwQgksGgI/bIy6FHuk=; b=u+XNAMusE3PkIYNMeVFxJtK240CSZvydN8KWxPIPs+ZuM4UPXlmNhUajpmmtNpWXY0 k4tzNTvDwAsnYR2/GGNkEhfQt79yriKdaNQBmWSXs2oSmiavLESUWZsRCTgGFfFVaJTX SibuVJvbmCGj+WoBrBjJQerIbtkgSTijvANKK7HR+6qB63VLMCAF58wL9NoxUkqN7uL7 4XtJBCW+R2BmNqR6VOqcWfNQj+YY5bPI/ZXyCcdVHv2SBeqFbKXdbpM+8Dki4VkKHJai GJUsIchGeo85OCcE006OK4uJ6tx9UppT/ENXGNaeCdgw6Fzr1+21LzZXJ64HUeJX3Bg0 ntbw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=JHdtkd0isnlFZVszr8HC1JsOnUwQgksGgI/bIy6FHuk=; b=ipwN9kqRuXMqEzsGWyjegA5ugdeUi1qXDExznm6wGC1N9mCg8LRbuOR16ovmTrfiYu JM8f8NXdCWQwc6QRePFv74a47G/TlMkUL9uuh/uN3IfDwyXDJk/DhMhXxs3Mm4oNpGdg ihDiCE429XWTvnlMfoJ51KFdRzzJhawHlHr33EMk1GRRY7Z02SnMeSqAE0Fok980dUKv vLdlJgyX2xyain6f5rsGaCikxk8T9WZf4WNLY53qUyGP2C0q3YlUgdPaJqc561IQxy99 NVTCyeVfalyft1V01Af0V76XCYVs6ewR1nV8Zy7Aa8aVJsjbkbW1t1K9ekIB5eoB2793 a6aQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mFesvE/QcWKu3XgwvgvJpnja1JVEj/3stSnM5vvjwKQxRMoiQqTM4WIuqS2QClmg==
X-Received: by 10.200.42.200 with SMTP id c8mr36852452qta.156.1487184569946; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:49:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.228] (c-73-167-64-188.hsd1.nh.comcast.net. [73.167.64.188]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r10sm2840997qte.1.2017.02.15.10.49.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:49:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <ABDD8B01-EC93-4ADD-AF59-57332A9C255E@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E9A401A8-6723-4722-8E72-180C6AD63DD6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:49:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqeshAHmvGukto+PKs_skVPF5bnukvw8+5_04YEx_6m_sQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?utf-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
References: <148455739520.22478.14651605359463322132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJ3w4NdCk8CBfNagcXT_VW_50+=xK=N7aB5HHqqn3stMt7Gy-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqf_AP9w1Bh_5kSB4YkLaV9XJ1tngufAiOMxVqQLwMruNA@mail.gmail.com> <aba52c11e462426bb3cbf66fcdca7783@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqcG004FuUkKa0Xk1AiOo-bO4aHweYDpxMeeg+_=dSK6FQ@mail.gmail.com> <5c9ed55cfdc94456baf19740ba62910c@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqeshAHmvGukto+PKs_skVPF5bnukvw8+5_04YEx_6m_sQ@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/sC82gX8qFt6DJKTVmKnzzVsxjwc>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:49:33 -0000

On Feb 15, 2017, at 1:32 PM, 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
> I personally don't think it a blocking issue for sedhcpv6, but, of
> course, the wg should decide it.

It definitely isn't a blocking issue, but Fred is right that if we are going ahead with encryption-only, which I agree is the right move, we need to do this work as well.