Return-Path: X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82F8421F85F4 for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:52:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -106.558 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.558 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oQxAgJf058Kh for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:52:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exprod7og108.obsmtp.com (exprod7og108.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.169]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B2321F861C for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob108.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUE9CJk/0//e81xNa7XNvYew7HSteSIAi@postini.com; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:52:38 PDT Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE51F809B for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 050BA19005C for ; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:52:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com) Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Tue, 11 Sep 2012 06:52:38 -0700 From: Ted Lemon To: "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure Thread-Index: AQHNggw8RB5j9kIDsUGrLGIrni1hs5eFuqYA Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:52:36 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <66EE01829867944B87E63F8BF9AA56F0@nominum.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Call for adoption: draft-boucadair-dhc-triggered-reconfigure X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 13:52:42 -0000 On Aug 24, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Ted Lemon wrote: > If you think this is something the working group should work on, please r= eply to this message saying so. If you think the working group should not= do this work, please reply to this message saying so. We will evaluate c= onsensus to adopt on September 7. We didn't actually get a huge response to this, so it may have been prematu= re of me to approve the draft submission. But we have at least three wo= rking group participants who think it's a good idea, and nobody reacted in = horror. If, reading this, you feel that it was a mistake for me to approv= e the draft, please say so. Otherwise, let's get to work on it!