Re: [dhcwg] Options in base doc for DHCPv6

Ted,

Yes, we are wasting a lot of time arguing about this.  Why don't you just 
agree with me?

:-)

- Ralph

At 04:40 PM 1/24/2002 -0600, Ted Lemon wrote:
>>I fully support Ralph in this. I want to make sure we can get the base 
>>draft through as that will likely take some time for the IESG to digest 
>>and we don't want a small issue to hold up this main work.
>
>AFAIK we do not have a problem.   We are wasting substantial time arguing 
>about this.   Why don't we just send it to the IESG and see what they say?
>    If they push back hard on an option, *then* we can take it out of the 
> draft.   Or do we think that if we just take out all the "non-essential" 
> options, IESG will pass this without comment?   :')
>

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg