Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in draft-aboba-dhc-domsearch-06.txt
Thomas Narten <narten@raleigh.ibm.com> Wed, 26 September 2001 11:14 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA12986; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:14:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA24123; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:05:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA24098 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:05:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hygro.adsl.duke.edu (cichlid.adsl.duke.edu [152.16.64.203]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA12458 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from hygro.adsl.duke.edu (narten@localhost) by hygro.adsl.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f8QB27P04976; Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:02:07 -0400
Message-Id: <200109261102.f8QB27P04976@hygro.adsl.duke.edu>
To: Bernard Aboba <aboba@internaut.com>
cc: dhcwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in draft-aboba-dhc-domsearch-06.txt
In-Reply-To: Message from "Tue, 25 Sep 2001 21:43:14 PDT." <Pine.BSF.4.21.0109252140140.25124-100000@internaut.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 07:02:07 -0400
From: Thomas Narten <narten@raleigh.ibm.com>
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Now that these comments have been incorporated, I believe that this > document is ready for IETF last call. I'll wait for Ralph to signal that the document is ready, but here are my comments. Main item is that it has a normative reference to > [7] Lemon, T., "Encoding Long DHCP Options", Internet draft (work in > progress), draft-ietf-dhc-concat-01.txt, July 2001. so these two document should go together. Some minor wording nits (these can be dealt with later): > the domain search list. This document defines a new DHCP option which > is passed from the DHCP Server to the DHCP Client to specify the domain > search list when resolving hostnames. Is the option allowed to be included in client messages? I would assume so. Indeed, isn't it the case that clients can include any option if to signal a desire to the server to get such an option returned? If so, I guess this isn't really an issue. > In this scheme, an entire domain name or a list of labels at the end of > a domain name is replaced with a pointer to a prior occurrence of the s/is replaced/can be replaced/ > same name. Despite its complexity, this technique is valuable since the Thomas _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Interface Guja, ArturX
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Bernie Volz (EUD)
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Bernie Volz (EUD)
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- RE: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comments in… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Thomas Narten
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [dhcwg] Incorporation of WG last call comment… Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ralph Droms
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Erik Nordmark
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ted Lemon
- Re: [dhcwg] Interface Ralph Droms