IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Thu, 13 September 2012 03:19 UTC

Return-Path: <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4335B21E8042 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:19:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.549
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.549 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.050, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kwZvP9jyymWa for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og125.obsmtp.com (exprod7og125.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5078E21E8034 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:19:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell-too.nominum.com ([64.89.228.229]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob125.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUFFQqfZZXe6Xj895HFJh2Qd1Uk77MTKQ@postini.com; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:19:06 PDT
Received: from archivist.nominum.com (archivist.nominum.com [64.89.228.108]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by shell-too.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C5C108005 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:19:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from webmail.nominum.com (cas-01.win.nominum.com [64.89.228.131]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.nominum.com", Issuer "Go Daddy Secure Certification Authority" (verified OK)) by archivist.nominum.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 798C219005C; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:19:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Ted.Lemon@nominum.com)
Received: from MBX-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.133]) by CAS-01.WIN.NOMINUM.COM ([64.89.228.131]) with mapi id 14.02.0247.003; Wed, 12 Sep 2012 20:19:05 -0700
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT
Thread-Index: Ac2KjY71PtWS24h1QXS6kMDArPK2SwGygaIAAA/qRwAAAH0rAA==
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:19:04 +0000
Message-ID: <FEA13E3F-6EC1-4D53-B891-4895744FE1E7@nominum.com>
References: <867F4B6A1672E541A94676D556793ACD16E4DC56E6@MOPESMBX01.eu.thmulti.com> <BD87928F6BFAEF4EBEB883E1C4F587723023AB16@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4FDE8B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E0F4FDE8B@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [192.168.1.10]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <9F18DCEF402A92428A76113A9BF8069D@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: dhc WG <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] SOL MAX RT
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2012 03:19:07 -0000

On Sep 12, 2012, at 11:05 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> Not really sure what the hold-up is as I thought this was pretty cut and dry.

The responsible AD (Jari) was succeeded by a new AD (Brian Haberman).   The draft then fell between the cracks.   This is a really good reason to just do drafts in the working group...

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email