[dhcwg] Re: Rebind failure behavior

"Guja, ArturX" <ArturX.Guja@intel.com> Mon, 24 September 2001 13:02 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA01468; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:02:37 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA19876; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:59:55 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA19819 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:59:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from calliope1.fm.intel.com (fmfdns01.fm.intel.com [132.233.247.10]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA00868 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:59:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (fmsmsxv042-1.fm.intel.com [132.233.48.110]) by calliope1.fm.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4, v 1.42 2001/09/04 16:24:19 root Exp $) with SMTP id IAA07279 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 08:58:11 GMT
Received: from fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM ([132.233.42.29]) by fmsmsxvs042.fm.intel.com (NAVGW 2.5.1.6) with SMTP id M2001092401574527446 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:57:45 -0700
Received: from alpha.igk.intel.com ([172.28.168.68]) by fmsmsx29.FM.INTEL.COM with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id T2T6Z53B; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 01:58:15 -0700
Received: by alpha.igk.intel.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <NMB58H1F>; Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:58:10 +0200
Message-ID: <413FBB0BA5AED1119122000083234B1A0247B446@alpha.igk.intel.com>
From: "Guja, ArturX" <ArturX.Guja@intel.com>
To: "Dhcwg (E-mail)" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 10:58:05 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Subject: [dhcwg] Re: Rebind failure behavior
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org

Hello,

I noticed another bug here:

>    RT for each subsequent message transmission is based on the previous
>    value of RT:
>
>       RT = RTprev + RAND*RTprev

If RAND is chosen from between -0.1 and 0.1, this certainly cannot be so.

I believe it should have read:

       RT = RTprev * 2 + RAND*RTprev

Otherwise, the sequence of RT would fluctuate instead of rising. It
could even lead to negative RTs.

Artur Guja

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg