RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6

"Vijayabhaskar A K" <vijayak@india.hp.com> Wed, 16 January 2002 18:24 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16658 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:24:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id NAA13581 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:24:06 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13294; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:16:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA13270 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:16:17 -0500 (EST)
Received: from palrel11.hp.com (palrel11.hp.com [156.153.255.246]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16432 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:16:14 -0500 (EST)
Received: from hpuxsrv.india.hp.com (hpuxsrv.india.hp.com [15.10.45.132]) by palrel11.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE70E00621; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 10:15:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nt4147 (nt4147.india.hp.com [15.10.41.47]) by hpuxsrv.india.hp.com with SMTP (8.8.6 (PHNE_17135)/8.8.6 SMKit7.02) id XAA21159; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:41:27 +0530 (IST)
Reply-To: <vijayak@india.hp.com>
From: "Vijayabhaskar A K" <vijayak@india.hp.com>
To: "'Martin Stiemerling'" <Martin.Stiemerling@ccrle.nec.de>, <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:46:40 +0530
Message-ID: <001001c19eb9$f2211fc0$2f290a0f@india.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <8370000.1011183958@elgar>
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

We can use this for forwarding from the network which 
don't have any router advertisement, but has a node
in the network, attached to the another network and has 
ip-forwarding enabled. 
~vijay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:56 PM
> To: vijayak@india.hp.com; dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
> 
> 
> >> In the case of no on-link router, no routes are required!
> >
> > In the absence of an on-link IPv6 router, hosts might use configured
> > tunnels to reach other IPv6 networks. Such routes can be sent in
> > static-route option.
> >
> 
> Yes, this might be useful, but doesn't sound directly like 
> 
static routes, 
> but more than transistioning mechanismen (IPv6 over IPv4 
> tunnel). There are 
> two DSTM options in the draft, but they may not be sufficient 
> for this 
> purpose.
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg