RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6

We can use this for forwarding from the network which 
don't have any router advertisement, but has a node
in the network, attached to the another network and has 
ip-forwarding enabled. 
~vijay

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-admin@ietf.org]On Behalf Of
> Martin Stiemerling
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:56 PM
> To: vijayak@india.hp.com; dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [dhcwg] static route option for dhcpv6
> 
> 
> >> In the case of no on-link router, no routes are required!
> >
> > In the absence of an on-link IPv6 router, hosts might use configured
> > tunnels to reach other IPv6 networks. Such routes can be sent in
> > static-route option.
> >
> 
> Yes, this might be useful, but doesn't sound directly like 
> 
static routes, 
> but more than transistioning mechanismen (IPv6 over IPv4 
> tunnel). There are 
> two DSTM options in the draft, but they may not be sufficient 
> for this 
> purpose.
> 
> Martin
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> 

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg