[dhcwg] Questions about one more dhcpv6 options

"Kyemyung Jung" <jgm2000@i2soft.net> Mon, 12 November 2001 00:14 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA01038 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:14:28 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id TAA05926 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:14:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA05805; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:01:40 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA05786 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:01:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from i2soft_web ([211.240.20.130]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id TAA00905 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Nov 2001 19:01:33 -0500 (EST)
Received: by i2soft_web with MERCUR-SMTP/POP3/IMAP4-Server (v3.00.25 RI-0000000) for <dhcwg@ietf.org> at Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:03:33 +0900
From: Kyemyung Jung <jgm2000@i2soft.net>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2001 09:02:58 +0900
Message-ID: <KHEIJDLDKPOKPBNKCKKLKEFACAAA.jgm2000@i2soft.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987"
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by optimus.ietf.org id TAA05787
Subject: [dhcwg] Questions about one more dhcpv6 options
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I am wondering.
I have studied about DHCPv6.
Not only one option but also several options can be contained when the message of DHCPV6 is sent to server.
How can options be connected at this moment?
It is possible for One of the options to be connected  by DHCPV6 HEADER.
Then, the rest of the options should be connected too, shouldn't they?

I am just wondering why a pointer on next option doesn't be contained in part of DHCP options.
If there are additional ways besides this way, i'd like to know it. 

For instance, 
how can several options be connected to DHCPv6 HEADER when the message of reply is sent from server.

I'd like to have your opinion via DHCWG MAILING LIST

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
http://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg