Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Berlin?

Roy Marples <roy@marples.name> Wed, 01 June 2016 11:29 UTC

Return-Path: <roy@marples.name>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4145112B059 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 04:29:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <ovg4D4ArgAM4>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Amavis-Alert: BAD HEADER SECTION, Duplicate header field: "To"
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.327
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.327 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ovg4D4ArgAM4 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 04:29:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.marples.name (uberserver.marples.name [77.75.106.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F98312D186 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 04:29:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail.marples.name (Postfix, from userid 1010) id C1C16A159C; Wed, 1 Jun 2016 12:29:25 +0100 (BST)
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 0:rcube.php
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 12:29:25 +0100
From: Roy Marples <roy@marples.name>
To: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <574EBBE0.4010202@gmail.com>
References: <5733617B.1040309@gmail.com> <574EBBE0.4010202@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <981936568739f74a5ea8b3daa4ddc7ab@mail.marples.name>
X-Sender: roy@marples.name
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.2
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/uwRTKsfugW3ShE-x-W6beBA0vkc>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP hackathon in Berlin?
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 11:29:33 -0000

Hi

On 2016-06-01 11:41, Tomek Mrugalski wrote:
> We're lacking client support, so the plan is
> to hack a client during the hackathon. It seems the easiest open source
> client to modify is Dibbler, but we're also looking at the ISC DHCP
> client modification.

No love for dhcpcd for client testing?
http://roy.marples.name/projects/dhcpcd

While I think it should already support the basics of RFC7550 I haven't 
extensively tested it against every bullet point.
It should also support secure DHCPv6 from RFC3315 as well. I'm quite new 
to this list and am unaware if there are any newer RFC documents in the 
works to change secure transactions over RFC3315.

Roy