Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013

Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com> Mon, 11 November 2013 19:00 UTC

Return-Path: <kkinnear@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3371511E8165 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:00:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tuehv29OsvwM for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:00:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229D521F898A for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:00:37 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2178; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1384196437; x=1385406037; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc: content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=fZ4bcJuvtyUVAT89r0h3OrorKtRmrRohNm4JhgKe9wU=; b=Zuxv2pcimZ8XMwfrwxQgJewo1olUkq8EAVJEi3xL5Jm3NcPkRCh1IYsE KgP+eLfHnHqgTqDmCaLLSAGJP01PTMNUh1VprnaKk5hZqobh5yoq/nZSu zDgEWgn5D8YnMa0HrxzL+v3n4sTmXeySP2dwoYLVfnXnfwfQSUjaWuwNp w=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,679,1378857600"; d="scan'208";a="239963596"
Received: from rcdn-core-6.cisco.com ([173.37.93.157]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2013 19:00:34 +0000
Received: from [161.44.65.120] ([161.44.65.120]) by rcdn-core-6.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rABJ0XXY004249; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:00:33 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89833@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:00:35 -0500
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <10BFA6CC-9416-441B-AB47-A865E30D60A9@cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD20B47@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AD89833@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: Kim Kinnear <kkinnear@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:00:42 -0000

I support adoption of this draft as a working group work item.

Regards -- Kim

On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:

> Reminder that this call ends today – so far, we have had limited responses in favor of adopting this work.
>  
> If you support this work and would like to see it advance, please let us know ASAP. You can also review the slides presented in Vancouver at http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-dhc-5.ppt.
>  
> There was some discussion at the Vancouver session regarding the size of messages containing certificates and a suggestion to consider URIs as well as to look at IKE and how it handles some of these issues. However, these are not necessarily reasons to delay adoption.
>  
> -          Bernie
>  
> From: dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bernie Volz (volz)
> Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 11:31 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02 - Ends November 11, 2013
>  
> Hi all:
>  
> The author has requested a call for adoption by the WG for draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6-02. (This document “replaces” http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6-07 as that document went to the IESG – seehttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dhc-secure-dhcpv6/ for more details. The new document is very different so please read it.)
>  
> This call is being initiated to confirm whether there is WG consensus to adopt this work as DHC WG draft. Please state whether or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this mail. If you are not in favor, please also state your objections in your response. This adoption call will complete on November 11, 2013 – after the IETF meeting as it will likely be on the DHC WG agenda.
>  
> The HTML version of the document can be viewed at http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-jiang-dhc-sedhcpv6.
>  
> Regards,
> Tomek & Bernie
>  
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg