[dhcwg] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-11

Jim Reid via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Tue, 30 April 2024 13:54 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Jim Reid via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: dnsdir@ietf.org
Cc: dhcwg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification.all@ietf.org, last-call@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <171448526988.4421.5547502842651566321@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Jim Reid <jim@rfc1035.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 06:54:29 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/vkvNfL6JyqK6FFuEGMBBU6p3ZzI>
Subject: [dhcwg] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc-addr-notification-11

Reviewer: Jim Reid
Review result: Ready with Nits

The I-D is nearly ready and most of my earlier review comments have been
satisfactorily addressed by the authors.

One problem remains IMO. Section 6 still mentions ownership of an IP address.
This is wrong. It's also inappropriate language for an IETF standards document.
IP addresses are not property and therefore they cannot be owned.

I suggest changing

"This prevents a host from registering an address owned by another host."

to

"This prevents a host from registering an address already used by (or assigned
to) another host."

[dhcwg] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf-dhc… Jim Reid via Datatracker
Re: [dhcwg] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Jen Linkova
Re: [dhcwg] Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Jim Reid
[dhcwg] Re: Dnsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Li HUANG