Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Wed, 15 February 2017 18:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25968129B1E for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:32:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G1ZLuE9QMS4o for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:32:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE358129B13 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:32:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u25so159990554qki.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:32:57 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=P85m8wxEPi5H/6quAS2ujAG1Z7e7wXx8/L6pDyf/9Xc=; b=t3eHX/HPxOw1K5kDlEMSaWTxyGQ1zuV9NLnwjdKzVy669ZPdf/5bKEIoUzwoyitpqt wiPHUiXJJw4cNik8PHK0HRc46rj/RCNsYtW6yqNGVmtuk1tNtqYT3cSFGBUQ7w/rvdTG eo1NP5AxmY9pzfRK+IGQ58I8JT80mKv3vzmiPKp1StPucCzC90bFSSKDCZSX7k9jW0k1 zh0yHCay6gchyS86e0GJtfnBIJd4WxSKYu+sZSctvX35Xef2f70LBbplXuU71KBsKd0O gFzv/HwWsSDNzGj++xQwnKm+sqs4/NE34dabbkKJNsSRfmJwfVH4BsqT97P3SdMCnWQ9 DtyA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=P85m8wxEPi5H/6quAS2ujAG1Z7e7wXx8/L6pDyf/9Xc=; b=ETGkO/bm2zCPEzBkGFRMVCBrBlp6Pqmi1ZrAPpbCdjIPEzKPbBCPKMqAU0HO8VRxL+ RSI4lF4AUhOuj3zCC3lcD4vGwnzW0i4B7gySoDzUtv7omXcvOaL35G74kjwd4H7eGmpp G+8P7ozMYEBITVMmYfgQeMuRpWTifFQ1NEXwcMReMRM2w201KZ2RhzGAVbeh47qy312x o6oaNbF86R6swvsJJJrK4Ogl9p6wdgQYOYw0wVycOZj+nKjVxFubZqDYkQq3k5doVFTh CJ+8vbRkRD4icBpeSAqKqJNQJD9Et76H2whbNdnXVAHTbdRZGjACmYcU4dbwZX5TwQFZ GGqQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nCgeCt8rmjfDgdGnulwcz9FQbJjl3HPC1tmCfxpLDtPbd5zbIVigRcHyWXuQ+Q+jj3FJgZulbu86CyEg==
X-Received: by 10.55.122.130 with SMTP id v124mr31827520qkc.19.1487183577038; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:32:57 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.237.60.29 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:32:56 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <5c9ed55cfdc94456baf19740ba62910c@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <148455739520.22478.14651605359463322132.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAJ3w4NdCk8CBfNagcXT_VW_50+=xK=N7aB5HHqqn3stMt7Gy-Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqf_AP9w1Bh_5kSB4YkLaV9XJ1tngufAiOMxVqQLwMruNA@mail.gmail.com> <aba52c11e462426bb3cbf66fcdca7783@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CAJE_bqcG004FuUkKa0Xk1AiOo-bO4aHweYDpxMeeg+_=dSK6FQ@mail.gmail.com> <5c9ed55cfdc94456baf19740ba62910c@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 10:32:56 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: iLYuhL8x59xs0SBLTgSh5IKhVfI
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqeshAHmvGukto+PKs_skVPF5bnukvw8+5_04YEx_6m_sQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/vpI5quBczoukGCgoht9pujM1ufo>
Cc: dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-dhc-sedhcpv6-20.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:32:59 -0000

At Wed, 15 Feb 2017 18:07:29 +0000,
"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:

> > It's probably better to describe the issue in
> > sedhcpv6 with a reference to the RAAN draft as a possible future
> > solution to it if and when it's adopted and standardized.
>
> If sedhcpv6 will not support an authentication-only mode, then it
> can' t go forward until RAAN is adopted as a wg item. Otherwise,
> an encryption-only sedhcpv6 w/o RAAN would break DHCPv6 PD.

I personally don't think it a blocking issue for sedhcpv6, but, of
course, the wg should decide it.

--
JINMEI, Tatuya