Re: [dhcwg] configuring SOCKS(v5) via DHCP

"Ms. Li HUANG" <bleuoisou@gmail.com> Fri, 01 April 2022 05:28 UTC

Return-Path: <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 880733A13AD for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:28:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.107
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.107 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rqI2ff7kCdSh for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x531.google.com (mail-ed1-x531.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::531]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D2AB3A1792 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x531.google.com with SMTP id g20so1647791edw.6 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:28:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XCfZqZttQP37qDiK3KUckHLI31HUgiajyfH0H6p5F9E=; b=ZORa/vClbqg+IxoVMiSp/wp2IYVaVBoZ8broghmmZxBvko0yEenFLzVxBRr3VDT9u0 mOJGnR/jW3D6T2N4foo4di0XYNqlYPZSuFtJzDZ/5UmIzAC4rnzv330kQYDNjYUKQ830 mN2RC7AZr8UV8W1w6BBq7LdalAyKbbGNKvHPDQ2FG6xHfTv+98Iz7nlyiSNlVg6CoJ+Y UADQGuUuCfsJyzIkqTHYUp5uQ8keNFJO4HR5TwKTOache+aOLyPxPcUEhWR+uvGq1Kpz faoV0eIhIsUZJN+QYaq/Z39c1ChJsXxunkEbbPThldKIv4BGr5PypZWN4fVAuuLTz8U8 E+bQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XCfZqZttQP37qDiK3KUckHLI31HUgiajyfH0H6p5F9E=; b=onloskt/kg3S4hGbfuJsqa9oPM5B4AtyVc4rRQVWExrmTcI7rr4Qgen9SgGn0Fa9qK PMas9UJMLYRFupno4JVfIn4pn7QlK+qMp9mUA0b5ONUDURI+hfH3CkADZxdoGMX1u+Zk i9o1TUPsm8THExekV539LzdoWSamJ2AUewIiLiLyKxdQSND6jer6KK7gxNJDwjBf2dQd Lr4qjt9k/tbOlkIwLzUe54J2ShqFp5f5GQCqrQ57Zj/pwS+RYx+RnXZ+2pYGZMzBB2zz 7RTZIsRvbDVCv9Nc+FpFv9rjIaBK0cI1PrcKdvOkV2WXBwwQEkx1GKBYumQ73Gg8NrMi TU6A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5335gI8lP+LN/VIpTZNoS+KRS5gFQkm6qQFwg/mndQmATt0wkcok 2h31cnqkl3z76kRi1aujtuA4uZg3M1J+PXAYQwU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzHfm5POSJczDFFfEbHNzYQiQiX14uPAYKnvl6Sactd2BYp3xuuPtr57IlmbFchcV3Tu4iqH1B5Cvv6xlLaKGg=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:207a:b0:419:3e9f:494f with SMTP id bd26-20020a056402207a00b004193e9f494fmr19401904edb.397.1648790904189; Thu, 31 Mar 2022 22:28:24 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <75372.1648314192@dooku> <19651_1648451170_62415E62_19651_399_1_f3c48b5795614a8181164612ae074bce@orange.com> <97763.1648473331@dooku> <CAGGiuEbjH=wJ38OKfmPSK2DM-7c1m66-3L7hdyFhxj1Q6mhtUg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAGGiuEbjH=wJ38OKfmPSK2DM-7c1m66-3L7hdyFhxj1Q6mhtUg@mail.gmail.com>
From: "Ms. Li HUANG" <bleuoisou@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 13:28:13 +0800
Message-ID: <CAGGiuEY_8K_b_swNkYuda8vScX5_3msqm35pL-JztiyuoqZ=bg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
Cc: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002737a005db910ccd"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/wXVnk_m1eqodzrIRYx2_gj6lbvI>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] configuring SOCKS(v5) via DHCP
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Dynamic Host Configuration <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2022 05:28:37 -0000

Apr. 1st 2022 13:24.hk w10pro.GLF7(7) r.s.m


Good Day,


"If there was a way to learn if SOCKS was in use on a particular network,
such
as via a DHCPv4 option, then devices could use it on networks where it
existed."


Just tried once only and uninstalled all of the for sock.proxy pay one,
(email enquiry yet back ) not not the Github free one,
maybe detected by the server wherever, such app anit. could not be able to
reach its server to properly complete the installation during the week?!


Regards
BleuOisou@gmail.com







On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 7:53 AM Ms. Li HUANG <bleuoisou@gmail.com> wrote:

> Mar 29 2022 07:40.hk S8
>
>
> Good Day,
>
>
>
> "If there was a way to learn if SOCKS was in use on a particular network,
> such as via a DHCPv4 option, then devices could use it on networks where
> it existed."
>
>
> when the switch told from supplier that,  at dual stack, if isp not
> allowing an  home.User to enough setting info such how many ip permitted,
> public host etc., the home.user even could not do the configuration with
> ''permission'?!
>
> Meanwhile the set up ipv6 prefix(s) ISP ever but not current using told
> was not routing, then if, how the network before's events to be
> consistently tracking , who caring them...?
>
> WAN mostly related to sock layer,
>
> since stranger switch appeared at between PCs ---(switch)---gateway---ISP
> in 2013 to owning a switch in later 2019 as  PCs -----Switch
> -----Gateway-----ISP
>               |                       |
>               -----(Switch)----
>
> two of mach each, who knowing the events on them....? Ehat sock version
> being used at dhcpv4 by when, and dhcpv6 since isp offering enterprise sort
> of v6 in  Apt 2014 where ofca.gov.hk never clearly responded on these yet.
>
>
>
> Regards
> Li HUANG
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, 05:43 Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> wrote:
>>     > There is no such an option as far as I know.
>>
>>     > We published this spec:
>>     >
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-boucadair-tcpm-dhc-converter-03
>>     > to cover the discovery of a "converter".
>>
>> Thank you for confirming my investigation.
>>
>> --
>> ]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh
>> networks [
>> ]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        | network
>> architect  [
>> ]     mcr@sandelman.ca  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on
>> rails    [
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>