Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-05 - respond by Feb. 3

Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com> Fri, 31 January 2014 09:31 UTC

Return-Path: <msiodelski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B09DE1A03F3 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:31:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQpS9jo5pobX for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lb0-x22c.google.com (mail-lb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476071A0388 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:31:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lb0-f172.google.com with SMTP id c11so3249880lbj.17 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:31:49 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7e0h6rEhbmfl1pK80dSl4L0HRf8zLKjVziXuVPLDkHA=; b=abCpkTlDJ3nMvdJl1BcpT7QyIeBzqqNGnhYqFciJPETUHvW2XQGvEM3cQL3uvPIaHB /SoEFLq0bJU1kPD7v/qQ7vo0O4XYyURFl4PHNEuRghUq3MGtM9rzAL9z88tMkMJO6cKf bW5JjdkD1+1pdbhjBEZjuclNpuO+H3ryEePOeXbSgPAwuRqxGSBI+5IEScjMJHSn3AiR nCBA0yjKPVdMtqd/Hc4kD+T6vGka4di2X8ldv7LBnvnlgFa0pbFFLpOsfhTdULF+a+0R EOn3B2KJu9UgeRE583dfYMurMkZgUA2Hu1nAk63Xwh5jqUJrACYxxkFcErm2pS+9/2OC kj2w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.153.5.136 with SMTP id cm8mr38497lad.82.1391160709044; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:31:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.112.62.166 with HTTP; Fri, 31 Jan 2014 01:31:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE3AD4A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE2B09C@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <52DD7366.3000101@gmail.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE3AD4A@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 10:31:48 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFGoqUPM73BAHmj7a+59HgKAdZR2oRbk6H4cbT1HtQdSY+Nw-Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ole_Tr=F8an?= <ot@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-05 - respond by Feb. 3
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:31:55 -0000

I have read this document and I strongly support it move forward.

One nit I have is this:

Note: A server SHOULD NOT provide additional bindings to the client
     as the client could accept a Reply from a different server (this is
     the same issue as in the Discussion under the Rapid Commit option,
     see section 22.14

I suggest adding "of [RFC3315]" at the end of this paragraph.

Marcin


On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Bernie Volz (volz) <volz@cisco.com> wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I (obviously) support this document moving forward.
>
> As there have been NO other comments about this document, PLEASE do review it and express your support (or provide comments as to issues that need to be resolved).
>
> - Bernie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tomek Mrugalski [mailto:tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 2:05 PM
> To: dhcwg@ietf.org
> Cc: Bernie Volz (volz); Ole Trøan
> Subject: WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-05 - respond by Feb. 3
>
> On 20.01.2014 19:40, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>> I request a WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-stateful-issues-05. There
>> have been no comments since I posted it just about 3 weeks, so I
>> assume all previous outstanding issues have been addressed sufficiently.
>
> Since Bernie is co-author, I'll manage this work group last call on my own. Authors believe that stateful-issues-05 draft is ready for WG last call. Please post your comments no later than on February 3rd.
>
> This is a second WGLC for this draft. The previous one was done almost exactly a year ago (see Ted's mail from 2013-01-14). This work had a good support back then, but the changes after it were sufficiently big that another WGLC is warranted.
>
> Please keep in mind that if you want this work to be published, you must express your support. The fact that you used to support this work some time ago is not sufficient.
>
> A friendly reminder: If you have any technical improvements that you'd like to see in DHCPv6, this is a good time to mention them. The on-going 3315bis work is mostly about doing minor corrections and clarifications, so any bigger changes are more appropriate for stateful-issues.
>
> Cheers,
> Tomek
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg