Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns-reconfigure-02 - respond by Jan 27, 2014
"Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com> Thu, 16 January 2014 17:34 UTC
Return-Path: <praspati@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com
(Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D441AE171 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:34:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.039
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-10.039 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9,
DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538,
SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8T9ge8m7L5Mq for
<dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E31C1AE132 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>;
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 09:34:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com;
l=2356; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1389893662; x=1391103262;
h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version;
bh=4jKSdBORknXxo4KSNysAgdjFUtMu6r3wl8Hed9FluAw=;
b=XY/vXmoqY1SgYoJXhbF2Zz/6VzcfdxhiBj6HsfLjzjfU71bgw4w3EVMZ
dSJ4kZvOZL9p8XKoPUM77Mzym54aHnW/xiqcoZysTEMRkOVn2JoET5iBL
k/B8NbOM6BoVWTgtIoUrg+dMuAp5lqalnlODle1X4TlOPh/vBpkoQRizg Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjAFAL0X2FKtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABZgws4VrsLgQ4WdIImAQEEAQEBGgpHGwIBCEYnCyUCBAESiAQNxGAXji4BAVaEOASJD48SgTGQZoFvgT6BcTk
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,668,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="13368673"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by
alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Jan 2014 17:34:21 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com [173.36.12.89]) by
rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s0GHYL0d002056
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:34:21 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x07.cisco.com ([169.254.7.150]) by
xhc-aln-x15.cisco.com ([173.36.12.89]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003;
Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:34:21 -0600
From: "Prashanth Patil (praspati)" <praspati@cisco.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>,
"dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns-reconfigure-02 -
respond by Jan 27, 2014
Thread-Index: AQHPEuEwZDXVSCEXckm05bt25496ng==
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:34:21 +0000
Message-ID: <CEFE15E8.13ED3%praspati@cisco.com>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AE1A630@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
<52D408FD.9000509@viagenie.ca>
In-Reply-To: <52D408FD.9000509@viagenie.ca>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030
x-originating-ip: [10.65.38.18]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <B7D915BE82DA8C45B0CC42606CA81BBD@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns-reconfigure-02 -
respond by Jan 27, 2014
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>,
<mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>,
<mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 17:34:37 -0000
Agreed, it's not necessary to report actual transition change. Notifying current state should suffice. -Prashanth On 1/13/14 9:10 PM, "Simon Perreault" <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote: >In favour. I commented on earlier revisions. > >Comments for future revisions: > >- First, I think it would be better protocol design to make >OPTION_HOST_CONNECTIVITY contain a bit field, where IPv4 and IPv6 would >be represented by bits that could be toggled independently. Other bits >would be reserved for future use. > >- Second, is it necessary for the relay to track and report >*transitions*? Isn't it better to make the relay report the current >state only, and let the DHCP server figure out the transition based on >the previous state? > >- Third, if we keep working with transitions, what is the initial state >of a new host? If I plug in a host and it sends an RA, does it go from >"no stack" to "IPv6-only"? Reporting the current state would deal with >this easily, whereas reporting transitions would require a new set of >messages I suppose. > >Simon > >Le 2014-01-13 10:12, Bernie Volz (volz) a écrit : >> Hi all: >> >> A call for adoption is being initiated at the request of the authors to >> determine whether there is WG consensus to adopt >> draft-wing-dhc-dns-reconfigure-02 as a DHC WG item. Please state whether >> or not you're in favor of the adoption by replying to this mail. If you >> are not in favor, please also state your objections in your response. >> This adoption call will complete on January 27, 2014. >> >> The HTML version of the document can be viewed at >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-dhc-dns-reconfigure-02. >> >> If there is consensus to adopt as a WG document, we will confirm with >> Ted to get it on the charter. >> >> Regards, >> >> Tomek & Bernie >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dhcwg mailing list >> dhcwg@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg >> > > >-- >DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca >NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca >STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca >_______________________________________________ >dhcwg mailing list >dhcwg@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns-rec… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Simon Perreault
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Simon Perreault
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… 神明達哉
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Prashanth Patil (praspati)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Tirumaleswar Reddy (tireddy)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Cong Liu
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Ram Mohan R (rmohanr)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Bernie Volz (volz)
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call - draft-wing-dhc-dns… Tomek Mrugalski
- Re: [dhcwg] WG Adoption Call Summary (adopted) - … Tomek Mrugalski