Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01 - Respond by Sept. 22, 2015

Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> Wed, 16 September 2015 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B5CC1A895C for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vk4Ao0pSEXko for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:45:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-la0-x236.google.com (mail-la0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9620D1A8871 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by lagj9 with SMTP id j9so137441023lag.2 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=d4bvShW8sDig+tq4vKnVsSyGOkUFaFEhr0UnUTBv8Ms=; b=XZQPObpxUs2hv+Ir+1+0f4EAjAMG5WdwW9otvIMVwa9+gVwJz1SByVBo2ONuNJxDT7 mjZPiZ04jgIKyRHXskKY3WI8RFIQy5IOCo2XMen5Sk2Fmjh2PreGeTlD1MrBrosARklI A8X6kMAiArjZbysVQqJNL5cvo27EUl2oTRjyt4SIuPMc69UkpRYizcmkiWnO7FwQH/eE KZyFg4uaoJELB0mutWF24QjtSpiYxzn5L40dozWVg6UPaU3gJnlpORSlU+0ybfAcgHKd Ohq52cHv4KwIlLVsRZrq4G29sXfqLe5Pnfu1U6cwU0bdS7JBGZgH3hmtD+ZsSN+s9zT1 uEYw==
X-Received: by 10.112.130.70 with SMTP id oc6mr19473263lbb.32.1442429143835; Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.100] (109107011157.gdansk.vectranet.pl. [109.107.11.157]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id g3sm4282506lbd.16.2015.09.16.11.45.42 for <dhcwg@ietf.org> (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 16 Sep 2015 11:45:43 -0700 (PDT)
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CC66107@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
From: Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110
Message-ID: <55F9B8D5.2030404@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 20:45:41 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1CC66107@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/xl9Vy7QA2H7Sax0nQFahzocyzGE>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC on draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01 - Respond by Sept. 22, 2015
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2015 18:45:48 -0000

With my co-chair hat off: I think the problem of DHCP privacy is
important and DHC should publish problem analysis document such as this
one. Therefore I support this document moving forward.

Disclaimer: I'm a co-author of this draft.

With my co-chair back on, I'd like to remind people that while this
document has been presented during DHC meetings several times and always
had favourable reception, the continuous support for it is not implied.
It is really helpful if you could clearly say that you support this
document (or state your objections if you don't). Doing a simple +1 is
useful, doing a thorough review is better.

Tomek

On 02.09.2015 23:44, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
> This message starts the DHC Working Group Last Call to advance
> draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01, Privacy considerations for DHCPv4  -- 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01. This
> document’s intended status is Informational. At present, there is no IPR
> file against this document.
> 
> This is a part of the WGLC of 3 documents
> (draft-ietf-dhc-dhcp-privacy-01,  draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-privacy-01, and
> draft-ietf-dhc-anonymity-profile-03).
> 
> Please send your comments by September 22th, 2015. If you do not feel
> this  document should advance, please state your reasons why.
> 
> Bernie Volz is the assigned shepherd.
> 
> - Tomek & Bernie