IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com> Thu, 30 November 2017 02:17 UTC

Return-Path: <mellon@fugue.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6485128AB0 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:17:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ztn8YLNP3rs for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x235.google.com (mail-qk0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BDED1287A3 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:17:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x235.google.com with SMTP id i130so7083389qke.4 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:17:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fugue-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=1x8VvgDsDfJxvHYGvupwKJJVPcYM3WcyJdkC8R9d8ME=; b=Cqwuu2Xayu7FzV9xKow9Ck1+wrvP2fUD1Zej/vA6Z2I+z56mwRQbeAmw+XOt/ZsxXz XOQQNltdR5KCqYsKqxgvIsGSCULYu6w+Y6tanupZkBkeKuyExCNszd2K3q5oC/WBCqaU ocjZ0vwvwhgkOQeKn/S3ANRpNemh4ScWEl8xLd7xKrDJyxCc9+IsQV9NUaFxHcPozn1A eZxynPahO4DSD8CkH9uZawA+Oim+zKknrSq+xonA5RBc+gA0q3g80o4/6X6bG8Zu6mqZ X99UZ0FBXjSJoQdnX0IuYxk+fkBuH/xlkXE9kJFpNL+Wcb4hYXDrlrqdXRjd+XB+keqM TEeA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=1x8VvgDsDfJxvHYGvupwKJJVPcYM3WcyJdkC8R9d8ME=; b=mhcaJHZ+y6ksTEbyRq3Up15Je3cwntEXqX2vhwBuqLGOxYJDqkHrZQ3xZEA4rYtIin 3HPVjQ0BX37pnUscT4E/BEW7kIjlNv6cdNFfh7tr1LhcvMKjeYljowfNyIbQ3urfqgri emG+CyUSuyFlXJGLdj9yAJlyXzuBACLX5JxmxcpdZy2Bs3CeTPy4BK0aN6xvx6h/4RDZ 3INl41tzwpwuJ4EXDZITUMB3dG/nzFlhGbqAzOG6+zeQYzUxFVJAk8lwk4xfLav/ORW3 KpB0e1U9xuq1zUV2d+qBR8rjVQEDA02PdxoDRPXNGTNwbVLMpzb5JIv2pzloPQuC0cRJ 0VRw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mJBVlSWope1EfBv/KdqoSy/y83S4RB+8xgyNGiU+fIMa2u8g+84 iKvyEYyDt131B9t4PKmmcBdy1w==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMa1o0+7Yv1cUaCAAOgWZ/v6uvuaZfZlZ/XsfXTrhavAUMPkdRjHO1zj8lX8oMUiWnbvmFq2yw==
X-Received: by 10.55.158.132 with SMTP id h126mr717599qke.245.1512008229278; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:17:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cavall.lan (c-24-60-163-103.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.60.163.103]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f56sm2287654qtk.13.2017.11.29.18.17.08 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 18:17:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Ted Lemon <mellon@fugue.com>
Message-Id: <EC108FCE-E299-49EC-BBEF-8E3928036F39@fugue.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2B5F0CE3-DB38-4BB2-8F13-B5FAA693217D"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.1 \(3445.4.7\))
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 21:17:07 -0500
In-Reply-To: <026179B8-61B6-4430-AA5C-A8B1ADA2CED5@cisco.com>
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port@ietf.org>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>, "dhc-chairs@ietf.org" <dhc-chairs@ietf.org>
To: "Naiming Shen (naiming)" <naiming@cisco.com>
References: <151198969282.31355.16877065112899804068.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <200CE2CC-D6D1-40BA-843A-1193DFFDEE74@fugue.com> <4364B55F-0BC5-42B9-965D-FEF9D9AED9C5@nostrum.com> <1F317916-E0C1-4EF5-A9C8-448FF02D3525@fugue.com> <001E840F-75A6-4D68-B029-B3665B066A45@cisco.com> <8563F7DE-86CC-45D9-BF2B-6CCB0AC292B8@fugue.com> <026179B8-61B6-4430-AA5C-A8B1ADA2CED5@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.4.7)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/yErsW-tPHuNsddRRoS8i7ZP8oUc>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] Ben Campbell's Discuss on draft-ietf-dhc-relay-port-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 02:17:12 -0000

On Nov 29, 2017, at 9:01 PM, Naiming Shen (naiming) <naiming@cisco.com> wrote:
> Note that the server does not need to listen on this port, but it needs to send back
> the relay-reply to that port, so I modified your text a little.
> the HTML diff is enclosed.

Oops, sorry, it's been a while since I was following this closely.  So the text should say something more like this:

Relay agents implementing this specification may be configured instead to use a source port number other than 67, and to receive responses on that same port.  This will only work when the DHCP server or relay agent to which such a relay agent is forwarding messages is upgraded to support this extension.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email