[dhcwg] Edit #5 of DHCPv6 spec
Ralph Droms <rdroms@ch2-dhcp150-26.cisco.com> Wed, 15 May 2002 12:55 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA00965 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:55:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id IAA13847 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:55:27 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA13540; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:53:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAA13505 for <dhcwg@ns.ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:53:49 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ch2-dhcp150-26.cisco.com (ch2-dhcp150-26.cisco.com [161.44.150.26]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id IAA00858 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:53:35 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from rdroms@localhost) by ch2-dhcp150-26.cisco.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g4FCrG801313; Wed, 15 May 2002 08:53:16 -0400
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:53:16 -0400
Message-Id: <200205151253.g4FCrG801313@ch2-dhcp150-26.cisco.com>
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms@ch2-dhcp150-26.cisco.com>
To: dhcwg@ietf.org
Reply-to: rdroms@cisco.com
Subject: [dhcwg] Edit #5 of DHCPv6 spec
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Narten: > 18.1.2. Creation and transmission of Confirm messages > > Whenever a client may have moved to a new link, its IPv6 addresses > and other configuration information may no longer be valid. Examples > of times when a client may have moved to a new link include: > > o The client reboots > > o The client is physically disconnected from a wired connection > > o The client returns from sleep mode > > o The client using a wireless technology changes access points > > In any situation when a client may have moved to a new link, the > client MUST initiate a Confirm/Reply message exchange. The client Hmm. I wonder if movement detection should just be dropped from DHC. The problem of determining whether you have reconnected to a new link is a generic problem, not just one that DHC has. If you have routers, for example, you could use RAs to determine that you have moved, which would then retrigger DHC (as appropriate). I could imagine an RA option that included a unique identifier for the link (this might be useful for mobility in general). Or, you could just see of the router you were using has changed (its link-local address is an identifier). Or, use the set of on-link prefixes on the RA. If they are the same as before, you presumably haven't moved. Having the client send DHC messages to the server to determine whether it has moved seems like a fair amount of overhead and sub optimal. Also, if one dropped the movement detection from DHC, would this allow you to do away with the Confirm? I.e., if a client detects that it has moved, then just have it redo the normal DHC exchanges. That would seem simpler. Plus, if a node has actually moved, the confirm will fail, and the normal DHC exchanges have to be used anyway. Response: We have clarified the definitions of Confirm, Renew and Rebind (see below). We have retained the Confirm message as it is used by a client in different situations from Rebind and Renew, and we have retained the references to "movement detection" as examples of situations in which a DHCP client may send a Confirm message. *** dhcpv6.tty Wed May 15 05:35:23 2002 --- dhcpv6-24.txt Tue Apr 23 15:35:14 2002 *************** *** 752,776 **** REQUEST (3) A client sends a Request message to request configuration parameters from a server. ! CONFIRM (4) A client sends a Confirm message to any ! available server when it detects that it may ! have moved to a new link to request that the ! servers verify that the addresses and current ! configuration parameters assigned by the server ! to the client are still valid. RENEW (5) A client sends a Renew message to the server that originally provided the client's addresses ! and configuration parameters to extend the ! leases on the addresses assigned to the client ! and to update other configuration parameters. ! ! REBIND (6) A client sends a Rebind message to any ! available server to extend the leases on the ! addresses assigned to the client and to update ! other configuration parameters; this message is ! sent after a client receives no response to a ! Renew message. REPLY (7) A server sends a Reply message containing assigned addresses and configuration parameters --- 752,778 ---- REQUEST (3) A client sends a Request message to request configuration parameters from a server. ! CONFIRM (4) A client sends a Confirm message to servers to ! request that the server validate and confirm ! that the addresses and current configuration ! parameters assigned by the server to the client ! are still valid. RENEW (5) A client sends a Renew message to the server that originally provided the client's addresses ! and configuration addresses to update the ! addresses assigned to the client and the ! lifetimes for those addresses, as well as the ! current configuration parameters assigned by ! the server to the client. ! ! REBIND (6) A client sends a Rebind message to update ! the addresses assigned to the client and the ! lifetimes for those addresses, as well as the ! current configuration parameters assigned by ! the server to the client; this message is sent ! after a client receives no response to a Renew ! message. REPLY (7) A server sends a Reply message containing assigned addresses and configuration parameters _______________________________________________ dhcwg mailing list dhcwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
- [dhcwg] Edit #5 of DHCPv6 spec Ralph Droms