Re: [dhcwg] [ntpwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Mon, 02 December 2013 14:30 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48BC31AE492 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:30:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M4yGcH0v_ZUE for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:30:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:3::184]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E107C1AE490 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 06:30:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (desk.marajade.sandelman.ca [209.87.252.247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DB720168; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 10:44:04 -0500 (EST)
Received: by sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id A192563B88; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:30:50 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7692963AEF; Mon, 2 Dec 2013 09:30:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
In-Reply-To: <F53087EB-C5E0-4305-929D-5BFEA3C266AD@bsdimp.com>
References: <20131202044734.B78E0406060@ip-64-139-1-69.sjc.megapath.net> <D5CCC8A9-10FF-4D57-AB42-D39AB4D8730F@nominum.com> <F53087EB-C5E0-4305-929D-5BFEA3C266AD@bsdimp.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.2; nmh 1.3-dev; GNU Emacs 23.4.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 09:30:50 -0500
Message-ID: <25757.1385994650@sandelman.ca>
Sender: mcr@sandelman.ca
Cc: NTP Working Group <ntpwg@lists.ntp.org>, "dhcwg@ietf.org WG" <dhcwg@ietf.org>, Hal Murray <hmurray@megapathdsl.net>, Ted Lemon <ted.lemon@nominum.com>, Bernie Volz <volz@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] [ntpwg] Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-ogud-dhc-udp-time-option-01.txt
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Dec 2013 14:30:57 -0000

Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
    > On Dec 1, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Ted Lemon wrote:
    >>> How close does the time have to be for DNSSEC to work?
    >> 
    >> Closer than 1970.

    > So 5 years in the future is no problem?

Under strict DNSSEC rules, 5 years in the future is the same as 5 years in
the past.

-- 
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>ca>, Sandelman Software Works