Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02
From: Sheng Jiang <[email-masked]>
To: Ted Lemon <[email-masked]>
Cc: dhc WG <[email-masked]>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2012 00:44:41 +0000
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>

The assumption we take here is: this is a fully DHCPv6-managed network, SLACC through RA is not allowed.

From: Ted Lemon [mailto:[email-masked]]
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:40 AM
To: Sheng Jiang
Cc: Gaurav Halwasia (ghalwasi); dhc WG
Subject: Re: WGLC: draft-ietf-dhc-host-gen-id-02

On Aug 15, 2012, at 8:18 PM, Sheng Jiang wrote:
The scenario is just like RA broadcast prefix for stateless address configuration. The only different is broadcast though DHCPv6.

So why not use RA in this case?