Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* dhc WG agenda

You are right about how the charter text is written. However, I have 
been interpreting this a bit more broadly.

The other side is that the DHC charter also has a security item.

In any case, I do not think we can jump to solutions that involve CGAs 
without first doing the groundwork: what are the possible approaches to 
using CGAs in the conjunction of DHCP? Its hard to separate the use of 
CGA addresses in DHCP from the benefits to protecting the DHCP process.

Please ask for the CSI slot as well and see where the discussion takes us.

Jari

JiangSheng 66104 wrote:
> Hi, Jari,
>
> Yes, there is a DHCP relevant chartered item in CSI work group as I
> quate below. However, it is quite different from this draft. The chartered
> item in CSI is mainly about how to use CGA in DHCP-managed networks. It is
> covered by my another draft:
> www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-jiang-sendcgaext-cga-config-02.txt
>
> The current CSI charter does not cover securing DHCP with CGA. That's why I
> submit this draft to DHC group. It is mainly adopting CGA to serve DHCP
> for security purpose. It is extension of DHCP, not extension of CGA. I think
> it is better to do this work in DHC WG rather than CSI. Based on the above
> understanding, I did not request a time slot in CSI
>
> "Develop an informational document analysing different approaches to
> allow SeND and CGAs to be used in conjunction with DHCP, and making
> recommendations on which are the best suited. Recharter based on the
> result of the analysis."
>
> Best regards,
>
> Sheng
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
> Date: Friday, July 25, 2008 8:28 pm
> Subject: Re: [dhcwg] *DRAFT* dhc WG agenda
>
>   
>>> Secure DHCPv6 using CGA                         S. Jiang         
>>>       
>> 10 
>>     
>>> minutes
>>>   <draft-jiang-dhc-Secure-DHCPv6-00>
>>>   Initial WG review; accept as WG work item?
>>>       
>> Note that we have another WG, CSI, whose charter has a work item on 
>> securing DHCP with CGA. Or to be more exact, producing first a 
>> design 
>> analysis before actually picking a solution.
>>
>> As a result, I don't think we want to adopt this document in the 
>> DHC WG.
>>
>> But don't take this as a suggestion to avoid the discussion! The 
>> discussion on the list has been useful, and we should also talk 
>> about it 
>> in the meeting. Has a slot been requested from CSI?
>>
>> Jari
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> dhcwg mailing list
>> dhcwg@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>>
>>     
>
>
>   

_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg