Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01 - Respond by March 31, 2014

Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com> Thu, 27 March 2014 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <msiodelski@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA68A1A0670 for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s8FhgEFG_sTi for <dhcwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:40:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-bk0-x22a.google.com (mail-bk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60191A0663 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:40:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-bk0-f42.google.com with SMTP id mx12so799664bkb.15 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type; bh=Utg49bRfCYN/wq+w293jbW/Nnnl4wEFTVHfdUiol1nM=; b=K445f/JTVRcKPU1qMh0WKtD//KfqYmSlht4iyKl6pqJiLYbzFkiC2DQZl5+K0gu6bG eNBmDx8nTut4M09/Gv6KY8kBkbZQfruqtneKdhd7yM6ct0uk164VX+j55TgsBvGxfRpP 6fwhTTKTFj/Xa5qKKK/fMTVmtAsGro2LRao3o8+QfFVRrodS63mR74eqxMdkP9AQzH/3 6x628aAspuBqNxIKjrvfgtXqQSXpWVnHYBYCHaJe/umtbXlF3R6ND+DwNiSBa/0kIeaN I+jWbB9VJhRVAKELZMLQUEWgf1M2MKLC7ox7czMoRy48DNiTFfmHG7IGO0rf9384yHaN utfg==
X-Received: by 10.204.61.136 with SMTP id t8mr3221829bkh.22.1395934807047; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:40:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:470:71:10d::10? ([2001:470:71:10d::10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id el11sm2460299bkb.8.2014.03.27.08.40.05 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 27 Mar 2014 08:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53344651.4050107@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 16:40:01 +0100
From: Marcin Siodelski <msiodelski@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Bernie Volz (volz)" <volz@cisco.com>, "dhcwg@ietf.org" <dhcwg@ietf.org>
References: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF08ACE@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com> <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF08BE7@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <489D13FBFA9B3E41812EA89F188F018E1AF08BE7@xmb-rcd-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030003040300020103030403"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/dhcwg/z_inJDtUGADheRlbZy23htrSWOU
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01 - Respond by March 31, 2014
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dhcwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:dhcwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg>, <mailto:dhcwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2014 15:40:16 -0000

I have read the document and I support it moving forward.
Other than Bernie's catch on Reconfigure-Request, I don't see any issues
with this document.

Marcin

On 13/03/14 04:03, Bernie Volz (volz) wrote:
>
> Oh, I should have clarified that the mechanism I suggested below
> applies to servers sharing lease information; for servers not sharing
> this data, there is no special handling for load balancing as each
> server would reconfigure just the clients it knows about.
>
>  
>
> -          Bernie
>
>  
>
> *From:*Bernie Volz (volz)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:53 PM
> *To:* dhcwg@ietf.org
> *Subject:* RE: WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01 -
> Respond by March 31, 2014
>
>  
>
> <WG co-chair hat off>
>
>  
>
> I have read this document and support it moving forward.
>
>  
>
> The only shortcoming is that there is no mention of how to handle the
> Reconfigure-Request messages in RFC 6977, Triggering DHCPv6
> Reconfiguration from Relay Agents. It does mention this RFC and that
> load balancing applies, but as a Reconfigure-Request can contain many
> Client-IDs how this is handled isn't specified (i.e., there is not
> just one hash bucket).
>
>  
>
> I think the mechanism here would be that a server only handles the
> client-ids that hash to hash buckets it is servicing and "skips" the
> other clients. Note that the server would send a Reconfigure-Reply
> listing the client-ids it skipped because of load balancing (as well
> as any other client-ids it was unable to initiate a reconfigure for)
> -- see section 6.6 of RFC 6977.
>
>  
>
> -          Bernie
>
>  
>
> *From:*dhcwg [mailto:dhcwg-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Bernie
> Volz (volz)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 12, 2014 10:36 PM
> *To:* dhcwg@ietf.org
> *Subject:* [dhcwg] WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01 -
> Respond by March 31, 2014
>
>  
>
> This WGLC is for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-01. Please send
> your comments by March 31, 2014. If you do not feel this document
> should advance, please state your reasons why.
>
>  
>
> Please take some time out to read this document and provide us your
> feedback (it is a very short draft).
>
>  
>
> Some history:
>
>  
>
> We had done a WGLC for draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-load-balancing-00 back in
> early 2013 and while we considered it to have sufficient consensus,
> there were comments that required a new revision and given the long
> gap between the last call and the revised document, we are doing
> another last call.
>
>  
>
> Tomek is the document shepherd.
>
>  
>
> Regards,
>
>  
>
> Bernie & Tomek
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg