Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01

Hi, Di!

Thanks for your valuable comment.

We read RFC 7128 (RPKI Router Implementation Report), and it really offers
a good example to follow.

Di Ma <madi@zdns.cn> 于2019年4月20日周六 上午11:00写道：

> I support adoption of this document which is going to help the IP solution
> provider and DHCP vendors to facilitate inter-operations.
>
> And I also suggest the authors see RFC 7128 (RPKI Router Implementation
> Report) which offers a good example to follow in terms of 'Current DHCPv6
> Server Software Cases’.
>
> Di
>
>
> > 在 2019年4月19日，03:36，Tomek Mrugalski <tomasz.mrugalski@gmail.com> 写道：
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > This message initiates a three weeks long DHC WG adoption call on:
> >
> > Title: Problem Statement of Multi-requirement Extensions for DHCPv6
> > Pages: 11
> > Date: 2019-03-10
> > Document: draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01
> > Link:
> >
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01
> >
> > Please respond by May 9th.
> >
> > This document has been presented several times in DHC. In Prague it was
> > presented again and there was a reasonable interest in the room.
> > If you support this document to be adopted, please say so. If you don't,
> > say so as well (and preferably explain your objections).
> >
> > Note to people who voiced support for this work in Prague - it is
> > necessary to confirm your support on the mailing list.
> >
> > Bernie & Tomek
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > dhcwg mailing list
> > dhcwg@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dhcwg mailing list
> dhcwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg
>

-- 

    Yours Sincerely,

*   Lin He*

Re: [dhcwg] Adoption call for draft-ren-dhc-problem-statement-of-mredhcpv6-01 - respond by May 9th