Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Options

Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com> Tue, 21 May 2002 17:26 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA20740 for <dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2002 13:26:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) id NAA03687 for dhcwg-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 21 May 2002 13:27:17 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA03530; Tue, 21 May 2002 13:25:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf.org (odin [132.151.1.176]) by optimus.ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id NAA03505 for <dhcwg@optimus.ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2002 13:25:13 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from toccata.fugue.com (toccata.fugue.com [204.152.186.142]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA20603 for <dhcwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2002 13:24:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from green.bisbee.fugue.com (dsl-64-193-175-153.telocity.com [64.193.175.153]) by toccata.fugue.com (8.11.3/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g4LHNWS29993; Tue, 21 May 2002 10:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tongpanyi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by green.bisbee.fugue.com (8.10.2/8.6.11) with ESMTP id g4LHP1d08713; Tue, 21 May 2002 12:25:01 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 12:25:00 -0500
Subject: Re: [dhcwg] DHCP Options
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481)
Cc: DHCP IETF mailing list <dhcwg@ietf.org>
To: Katia Linker <KatiaL@radlan.com>
From: Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>
In-Reply-To: <42AB6BE23C29D511831E0002B32024885BE115@messenger.radlan.co.il>
Message-Id: <ADF0E796-6CDF-11D6-91CA-00039367340A@nominum.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: dhcwg-admin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 1.0
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <dhcwg.ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: dhcwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> Anyway,
> it is impossible to send an option field of less than 312 bytes.
> Please, tell me if it's right.

I don't think so.   RFC2131 says the option field is variable in length, so 
presumably it could be as small as 64 bytes (the size of a bootp option 
field).


_______________________________________________
dhcwg mailing list
dhcwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcwg