re:[Diffserv-interest] Fw: RFC 3662 on A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB)
"Jeff Norman" <jnorman@nortelnetworks.com> Sat, 20 December 2003 00:06 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA04990 for <diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:06:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AXUdB-0001sI-8E for diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:06:05 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hBK065QC007195 for diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:06:05 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AXUd8-0001rV-87; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:06:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AXUcP-0001qM-Jp for diffserv-interest@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:05:17 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA04951 for <diffserv-interest@ietf.org>; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:05:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AXUcM-0001F8-00 for diffserv-interest@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:05:14 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AXUcI-0001Eb-00 for diffserv-interest@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:05:13 -0500
Received: from zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com ([47.129.242.57]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AXUcI-0001CW-00 for diffserv-interest@ietf.org; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:05:10 -0500
Received: from zcard309.ca.nortel.com (zcard309.ca.nortel.com [47.129.242.69]) by zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com (Switch-2.2.6/Switch-2.2.0) with ESMTP id hBK04ak24849; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:04:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <200312200004.hBK04ak24849@zcars04f.nortelnetworks.com>
Received: from zcard0kc.ca.nortel.com ([47.129.242.164]) by zcard309.ca.nortel.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id XLSTNKKV; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:04:36 -0500
Received: from wcars2kw (wcars2kw.ca.nortel.com [47.128.154.41]) by zcard0kc.ca.nortel.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id XLPWNDR7; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:04:37 -0500
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 19:04:31 -0500
X-Sybari-Space: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
From: Jeff Norman <jnorman@nortelnetworks.com>
Reply-To: Jeff Norman <jnorman@nortelnetworks.com>
Subject: re:[Diffserv-interest] Fw: RFC 3662 on A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB)
To: Roland Bless <bless@tm.uka.de>
cc: diffserv interest <diffserv-interest@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: Rosa 3.1
X-Rosa-Trace: jnorman@wcars2kw <47.128.154.41>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-ID: <Rosa..3.1.1031219190431.20083L@wcars2kw>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.8 required=5.0 tests=MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: diffserv-interest-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: diffserv-interest-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: diffserv-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv-interest>, <mailto:diffserv-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Differentiated services general discussion <diffserv-interest.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:diffserv-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diffserv-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv-interest>, <mailto:diffserv-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hmmm.... I would have thought that a single DSCP value may have been suggested for the LE PHB... perhaps a value of 000110 would suffice, although it's not compatible with precedence bits (which would be CS0, although I think is better than CS1 which conflicts with AF1*). Just my 2.3 cents, --Jeff In message "RFC 3662 on A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB) for Differentiated Services", Roland Bless writes: >Hi, > >FYI: this is a first draft in the PDB series. > >Begin forwarded message: > >Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:35:53 -0800 >From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >To: IETF-Announce: ; >Cc: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org >Subject: RFC 3662 on A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB) for Differentiated Services > > > >A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. > > > RFC 3662 > > Title: A Lower Effort Per-Domain Behavior (PDB) for > Differentiated Services > Author(s): R. Bless, K. Nichols, K. Wehrle > Status: Informational > Date: December 2003 > Mailbox: bless@tm.uka.de, knichols@ieee.org, > Klaus.Wehrle@uni-tuebingen.de > Pages: 17 > Characters: 39029 > Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None > > I-D Tag: draft-bless-diffserv-pdb-le-01.txt > > URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc3662.txt > > >This document proposes a differentiated services per-domain behavior >(PDB) whose traffic may be "starved" (although starvation is not >strictly required) in a properly functioning network. This is in >contrast to the Internet's "best-effort" or "normal Internet traffic" >model, where prolonged starvation indicates network problems. In this >sense, the proposed PDB's traffic is forwarded with a "lower" priority >than the normal "best-effort" Internet traffic, thus the PDB is >called "Lower Effort" (LE). Use of this PDB permits a network >operator to strictly limit the effect of its traffic on >"best-effort"/"normal" or all other Internet traffic. This document >gives some example uses, but does not propose constraining the PDB's >use to any particular type of traffic. > >This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does >not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this >memo is unlimited. > >This announcement is sent to the IETF list and the RFC-DIST list. >Requests to be added to or deleted from the IETF distribution list >should be sent to IETF-REQUEST@IETF.ORG. Requests to be >added to or deleted from the RFC-DIST distribution list should >be sent to RFC-DIST-REQUEST@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. > >Details on obtaining RFCs via FTP or EMAIL may be obtained by sending >an EMAIL message to rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG with the message body >help: ways_to_get_rfcs. For example: > > To: rfc-info@RFC-EDITOR.ORG > Subject: getting rfcs > > help: ways_to_get_rfcs > >Requests for special distribution should be addressed to either the >author of the RFC in question, or to RFC-Manager@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Unless >specifically noted otherwise on the RFC itself, all RFCs are for >unlimited distribution.echo >Submissions for Requests for Comments should be sent to >RFC-EDITOR@RFC-EDITOR.ORG. Please consult RFC 2223, Instructions to RFC >Authors, for further information. > > >Joyce K. Reynolds and Sandy Ginoza >USC/Information Sciences Institute > >... > >Below is the data which will enable a MIME compliant Mail Reader >implementation to automatically retrieve the ASCII version >of the RFCs. > > > > > > [ Part 2: "Included Message" ] > >This part is not included and can be fetched as follows: >NAME: 00000002.mimetmp > > > [ Part 3: "Included Message" ] > >This part is not included and can be fetched as follows: >NAME: rfc3662.txt > _______________________________________________ Diffserv-interest mailing list Diffserv-interest@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv-interest
- re:[Diffserv-interest] Fw: RFC 3662 on A Lower Ef… Jeff Norman
- Re: [Diffserv-interest] Fw: RFC 3662 on A Lower E… Roland Bless
- Re: [Diffserv-interest] Fw: RFC 3662 on A Lower E… Roland Bless