[Diffserv-interest] Re: [Tsvwg] Re: [NSIS] PPS and MF-PHB

"MORITA, Naotaka" <morita.naotaka@lab.ntt.co.jp> Tue, 11 November 2003 16:25 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08158 for <diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AJbKA-0003yC-J7 for diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:03 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id hABGP2R3015250 for diffserv-interest-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AJbK8-0003xR-Ry; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:25:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AJOYV-0000nc-S1 for diffserv-interest@optimus.ietf.org; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:46:59 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA01331; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:46:45 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AJOYS-0003Ed-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:46:56 -0500
Received: from tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp ([129.60.39.102]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AJOYR-0003Ea-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:46:55 -0500
Received: from vcs3.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (vcs3.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.110]) by tama5.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAB2krUC004345; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:46:53 +0900 (JST)
Received: from nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vcs3.rdh.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAB2kqpo001999; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:46:52 +0900 (JST)
Received: from eclscan3.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (eclscan3.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.5.69]) by nttmail3.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAB2kp8H000105; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:46:51 +0900 (JST)
Received: from imj.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by eclscan3.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3p2/3.7W) with ESMTP id LAA04812; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:46:51 +0900 (JST)
Received: from morita-ibmthink.lab.ntt.co.jp by imj.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.9.3p2/3.7W) with ESMTP id LAA09423; Tue, 11 Nov 2003 11:46:49 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <5.1.1.11.2.20031110203629.04c62f88@imj.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
X-Sender: nm014@imj.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1-Jr5
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:45:59 -0600
To: Roland Bless <bless@tm.uka.de>
From: "MORITA, Naotaka" <morita.naotaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Cc: diffserv-interest@ietf.org, "'tsvwg@ietf.org'" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <20031111003855.5c313dd0.bless@tm.uka.de>
References: <5.1.1.11.2.20031107093524.04528c98@imj.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp> <5.1.1.11.2.20031107093524.04528c98@imj.m.ecl.ntt.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [Diffserv-interest] Re: [Tsvwg] Re: [NSIS] PPS and MF-PHB
Sender: diffserv-interest-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: diffserv-interest-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: diffserv-interest@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv-interest>, <mailto:diffserv-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Differentiated services general discussion <diffserv-interest.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:diffserv-interest@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:diffserv-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv-interest>, <mailto:diffserv-interest-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

At 00:38 03/11/11 +0100, Roland Bless wrote:
 >Hi Naotaka,
 >
 >On Fri, 07 Nov 2003 09:36:44 +0900
 >"MORITA, Naotaka" <morita.naotaka@lab.ntt.co.jp>; wrote:
 >
 >> I would like to draw QoS experts attention to the following three documents.
 >>
 >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morita-tsvwg-pps-01.txt
 >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morita-tsvwg-mfphb-00.txt
 >> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-morita-tsvwg-mfverify-00.txt
 >>
 >> I am going to make a presentation on Monday morning at TSV WG.
 >
 >After reading draft-morita-tsvwg-mfphb-00.txt and attending your
 >presentation, I have some remarks related to this approach:
 >- I'm not quite sure whether this is really a PHB definition.
 >  It seems to me, that it is actually a mix of
 >  * a scheme for measured-based admission control and resource provisioning
 >  * a Per-Domain Behavior (see RFC 3086)
 >  * a PHB group description

Your understanding is correct, but I do not think it is a mix.
The key of the PPS is to utilize PHB for admission control.
The proposed new PHB, MF-PHB refers to two-subclasses,
but we do not have to define it as a group description.

 >
 >- The scheme inherently relies on feedback information and it should be made
 >  clear how the feedback can be provided (you mentioned RTCP as an example,
 >  what about others?).

Yes, it is.  As the PPS, I would like to describe the feedback mechanims,
but for a PHB, we do not have to.

 >
 >- Instead of defining a new PHB, possibly two Class Selector PHBs
 >  or even an AF class can be used ("green" packets get high priority after
 >  admission control, "yellow" and "red" packet may be used for probing).
 >  AF usually gives no guarantees for delay and jitter, however, if AF is
 >  provisioned properly, "green" packets may get some guarantee.

This kind of disucssion is what I wanted to do.
Sorry for spending much time on me presentation only.
Are you refering to Three Color Marker in RFC2697 and RFC2698?

 >
 >- For security and robustness, it is essential to police the markings
 >  for the higher priority. Otherwise the service guarantees for other users
 >  are violated by a malicious or ill-behaving end-system. Therefore, I think
 >  first-hop routers should do the policing (based on the feedback
 >  information?).

I agree.  Are there any opinion about the description in pps framework document?
Not sufficient?

 >
 >- I see some value in the overall approach, but IMHO the proposal may
 >  be turned into a description for a measurement-based
 >  admission control scheme and PDB using Class Selector PHBs.
 >
 >I copied to the relevant lists (diffserv-interest and tsvwg) as I'm
 >interested in other opinions.

Me, too.

 >
 >Best regards,
 > Roland
 >
 >_______________________________________________
 >tsvwg mailing list
 >tsvwg@ietf.org
 >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tsvwg

----------------------------------
Naotaka MORITA, Senior Research Engineer, Supervisor
Network Service Systems Laboratories
Information Sharing Laboratory Group
NTT
3-9-11, Midori-Cho, Musashino-Shi, Tokyo 180-8585 JAPAN
Tel. +81-422-59-7464, ISDN-Fax +81-422-60-4012
E-mail: morita.naotaka@lab.ntt.co.jp
MSN messenger: moritanaotaka@hotmail.com
NTT home page: http://www.ntt.co.jp/about/e/index.html 



_______________________________________________
Diffserv-interest mailing list
Diffserv-interest@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/diffserv-interest