IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Conclusion for Sequence Numbers - was Re: OVLI: comments to 4.3

Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> Wed, 11 December 2013 17:22 UTC

Return-Path: <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF52B1ADF46 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:22:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.24
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.24 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, HOST_MISMATCH_NET=0.311, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6rtmlQD-vsGl for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:22:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sessmg21.mgmt.ericsson.se (sessmg21.ericsson.net [193.180.251.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DE171AD75F for <dime@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 09:22:36 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb28-b7f268e000001b97-7f-52a89f56dec3
Received: from ESESSHC008.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by sessmg21.mgmt.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 0F.F6.07063.65F98A25; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:22:30 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ESESSMB101.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.197]) by ESESSHC008.ericsson.se ([153.88.183.42]) with mapi id 14.02.0347.000; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 18:22:30 +0100
From: Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com>
To: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>, Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] Conclusion for Sequence Numbers - was Re: OVLI: comments to 4.3
Thread-Index: AQHO9ok9YunEgHUBi06/+spHYoNMOZpPPMXQ
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:22:29 +0000
Message-ID: <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920973A7D7@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se>
References: <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519DB1B@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <C66C8914-AA7A-47F5-8EA4-7B0ECEDA5368@gmail.com> <52A5E902.20605@usdonovans.com> <7475B713-1104-4791-96B1-CE97632A0D69@nostrum.com> <B81C3281-95F9-4F28-8662-2E20A6AE96A1@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E476@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <1CD20507-B0FE-4367-804A-B831734CF060@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E6DC@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <F60A8AF3-C853-4E4A-A023-13E7238066D7@gmail.com> <5BCBA1FC2B7F0B4C9D935572D90006681519E712@DEMUMBX014.nsn-intra.net> <4A151D70-0291-4238-85B1-03BB54B361E6@gmail.com> <52A864FF.10705@usdonovans.com> <23887553-5068-477A-AE34-3DC5E3D5AC76@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <23887553-5068-477A-AE34-3DC5E3D5AC76@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [153.88.183.154]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrALMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+JvrW7Y/BVBBvdemFnM7zzNbjG3dwWb xf51DUwWG5p4HFg8ds66y+6xZMlPJo9ZO5+weKx628cawBLFZZOSmpNZllqkb5fAlfGudSF7 wTzWisfXt7I3ME5h6WLk5JAQMJE413SYGcIWk7hwbz0biC0kcIJRou2gAIS9hFGic2IWiM0m YCdx6fQLJhBbRCBcYt7UJ6wgNrOAh0TL5EVgtrBAqMSMJafZIWrCJK7u/QY0nwPINpK48R5s JIuAqsTfhafATuAV8JU4dW41UAkX0KozrBJT1m8Cm88pYCuxfdVTsNsYgW77fmoNE8QucYlb T+YzQdwsILFkz3mo+0UlXj7+xwphK0ksuv0Zql5HYsHuT2wQtrbEsoWvmSEWC0qcnPmEZQKj 2CwkY2chaZmFpGUWkpYFjCyrGCWLU4uLc9ONDPVy03NL9FKLMpOLi/Pz9IpTNzECY+3glt8a Oxi7r9kfYpTmYFES562a2RkkJJCeWJKanZpakFoUX1Sak1p8iJGJg1OqgZG3ZOO+ZZFHfj6+ ayodGSBwPLXyGvctZc2SRyx3OZtFub4Y6Z8+WWr3/4qiy/qTkz2Xb+ydo7ZQTmlt+PPVf5s/ an9bLyn21p7TUvfek3rf87P/mp9z2iLk+OrmiZinb23kqgV7HhfJpfubPeP+HnBT99zFk5nB Id0zqlhDve5zOCw1/Jl/s0+JpTgj0VCLuag4EQB/D37igwIAAA==
Cc: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Conclusion for Sequence Numbers - was Re: OVLI: comments to 4.3
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 17:22:39 -0000

Dear all,

> [Steve] Ulrich does bring up an interesting use case, where a client is receiving realm reports for the same realm from different agents.  We need to define the clients behavior in this case.  

[Jouni] Could we simply say that in this case the agents (or who ever inserts the realm report) MUST share the same view of the realm overload condition? Obviously how it is achieved would be implementation specific. I recall we have surfaced this topic earlier..

[MCruz] But... isn't simpler to use time instead of sequence? It would solve this case as long as any number of agents serving same realm are time synchronized.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email