IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01

"DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com> Mon, 16 December 2013 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <md3135@att.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7BE81AD8E1 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:15:43 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.737
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.737 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbMr1Uq6iSpe for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:15:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com [209.65.160.94]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE6F1AD7C5 for <dime@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 14:15:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown [144.160.229.24] (EHLO alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com) by nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com(mxl_mta-7.2.1-0) over TLS secured channel with ESMTP id c8b7fa25.0.4516137.00-2071.12609159.nbfkord-smmo06.seg.att.com (envelope-from <md3135@att.com>); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:15:40 +0000 (UTC)
X-MXL-Hash: 52af7b8c07450bde-d32c537c8100fed4d70be19f1e3868159c4eee05
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBGMFd9C005340; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:15:39 -0500
Received: from mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.239]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rBGMFWej005215 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:15:35 -0500
Received: from MISOUT7MSGHUB9D.ITServices.sbc.com (MISOUT7MSGHUB9D.itservices.sbc.com [144.151.223.93]) by mlpi407.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:15:18 GMT
Received: from MISOUT7MSGUSR9I.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.56]) by MISOUT7MSGHUB9D.ITServices.sbc.com ([144.151.223.93]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 16 Dec 2013 17:15:18 -0500
From: "DOLLY, MARTIN C" <md3135@att.com>
To: Steve Donovan <srdonovan@usdonovans.com>
Thread-Topic: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
Thread-Index: AQHO+qdAROROh2btzU6TgZiRdghkpppXsDaAgAADw4D//69S2w==
Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:15:17 +0000
Message-ID: <BEC8A694-75B4-4CB4-B875-C3D7DC52C7B5@att.com>
References: <70089680-BBFD-4E4C-B550-30FEAB5C611C@gmail.com> <087A34937E64E74E848732CFF8354B920975651D@ESESSMB101.ericsson.se> <C592D376-89C5-4D0F-8549-6CE1B8698396@nostrum.com> <C29F85B5-80ED-44D7-8B11-59BC64FE796B@gmail.com>, <52AF78D3.2060506@usdonovans.com>
In-Reply-To: <52AF78D3.2060506@usdonovans.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BEC8A69475B44CB4B875C3D7DC52C7B5attcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-AnalysisOut: [v=2.0 cv=KeZlR3kD c=1 sm=1 a=dhB6nF3YHL5t/Ixux6cINA==:17 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=sWlxvq5nJ24A:10 a=ofMgfj31e3cA:10 a=BLceEmwcHowA:10 a=zQP]
X-AnalysisOut: [7CpKOAAAA:8 a=KlJXIuD6BQwA:10 a=yakATiurAAAA:8 a=Z80JlwQ0A]
X-AnalysisOut: [AAA:8 a=0FD05c-RAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=lIIKv8pXcx8cCrZa]
X-AnalysisOut: [RrMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=qM39cor4HRgA:10 a=Hz7IrDYlS0cA:]
X-AnalysisOut: [10 a=BMZHtSBzE-QA:10 a=0MAqpqVwYqEA:10 a=f7GxY0FH8QIA:10 a]
X-AnalysisOut: [=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=VoFctKSfOFJWXRb2:21 a=bXnjBA5BIOxqLEXN:]
X-AnalysisOut: [21 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=]
X-AnalysisOut: [f-u9NA7JlfjjdNqE:21 a=aSEf5SwRO4ckoXdm:21 a=Qf7aqBCyVaDh30]
X-AnalysisOut: [OV:21]
X-Spam: [F=0.2000000000; CM=0.500; S=0.200(2010122901)]
X-MAIL-FROM: <md3135@att.com>
X-SOURCE-IP: [144.160.229.24]
Cc: "dime@ietf.org" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Dec 2013 22:15:44 -0000

Issue tracker is fine with a note at the  relevant spot making reference to the issue number

Martin Dolly
Lead Member of Technical Staff
Core Network & Gov't/Regulatory Standards
AT&T Standards and Industry Alliances
+1-609-903-3360
md3135@att.com<mailto:md3135@att.com>

On Dec 16, 2013, at 5:04 PM, "Steve Donovan" <srdonovan@usdonovans.com<mailto:srdonovan@usdonovans.com>> wrote:

+1
On 12/16/13 3:50 PM, Jouni Korhonen wrote:

On Dec 16, 2013, at 11:38 PM, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com><mailto:ben@nostrum.com> wrote:



I agree with submitting 01.

I disagree about removing controversial text, although I don't mind marking it as controversial. But I think it would be a better approach would be to take 01 as a baseline and start putting open issues in the issue tracker.


+1

Issue tracker would make this stuff somewhat more manageable.. and since we got a WG doc, issue tracker works just fine.

- Jouni




On Dec 16, 2013, at 10:50 AM, Maria Cruz Bartolome <maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com><mailto:maria.cruz.bartolome@ericsson.com> wrote:



Hello Jouni, all,

We got some open discussion without any conclusion yet, if you prefer to publish .01 version, I would suggest these open issues are properly covered there, or all related text is omitted.
Cheers
/MCruz

-----Original Message-----
From: DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jouni Korhonen
Sent: lunes, 16 de diciembre de 2013 17:47
To: dime@ietf.org<mailto:dime@ietf.org> list
Subject: [Dime] Submission of draft-ietf-dime-ovli-01

Folks,

I am somewhat tempted to publish -01 even if we still have some very rough edges and then continue from there. Any strong disagreements?

The place we lack text more or less entirely is Section 5.5.3. (for a reason) but will type in something later tonight (or so).

- Jouni

_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime


_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime



_______________________________________________
DiME mailing list
DiME@ietf.org<mailto:DiME@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email