Re: [Dime] open issues #1 in DOIC

Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com> Fri, 29 November 2013 08:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: dime@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 354DB1AD739 for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:56:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id G82maGJgUMDU for <dime@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22b.google.com (mail-la0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22b]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C2061ACB4E for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n7so6558287lam.2 for <dime@ietf.org>; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:56:33 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=aHMtdmSEnAc75MlKZ7RCxBiBxnbhcJeAdMMOZvhBIAo=; b=XpqOFBOijmKEHLQZygr56zDp6WMClX1+xrmq8PZ+f4JuxgmLJ+MRMZ09RgqhcOE10h oiDo1z5QhWDkX8sX3Y68J4jiEIT+m5Q1YGNwDEu8BX8txSdAl2OG6c6XlNuBQevJ3cPh cpBCivOaYRIJ6dvFaoYSZV3nCfJ0OQ2yZ+R0FYwyuQD3PjhnO+x/g7/24ODgBFGXM0/J zxVQbvNr3YHU6TOZcg1MxGcdQc48fj0BPnLA714A2o7QZBcUPgr3U/HlWLqXrl6Mikrg ubQ/iCGdAL1245CLBlIJArfxACAAqWPHyqZdksTDCctX4tj439ko1jUaDVtGNu6Vgo3X oaJQ==
X-Received: by 10.112.130.168 with SMTP id of8mr72987lbb.66.1385715393596; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:56:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [188.117.15.108] ([188.117.15.108]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t9sm38633184lat.1.2013.11.29.00.56.29 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:56:30 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\))
From: Jouni Korhonen <jouni.nospam@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9889_1385714340_529852A4_9889_16410_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E3093B0@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 10:56:30 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A1D903C0-B04B-4BAC-A756-F58D33485A84@gmail.com>
References: <5E28C8B7-2E5E-41E8-9592-24A19AD76826@gmail.com> <9889_1385714340_529852A4_9889_16410_1_6B7134B31289DC4FAF731D844122B36E3093B0@PEXCVZYM13.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
To: lionel.morand@orange.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510)
Cc: "dime@ietf.org list" <dime@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Dime] open issues #1 in DOIC
X-BeenThere: dime@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Diameter Maintanence and Extentions Working Group <dime.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/dime/>
List-Post: <mailto:dime@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime>, <mailto:dime-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 08:56:37 -0000

Ok.


On Nov 29, 2013, at 10:38 AM, lionel.morand@orange.com wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> For me, "pseudo-session" refers to session-based oriented applications that do not rely on the session-id for message correlations but on something else e.g. user-name. So it is implied that the same server is contacted by the client managing the session. In the Cx example, the same origin-host will be used in the client-initiated requests after the initial exchange and the server discovery phase.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Lionel 
> 
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : DiME [mailto:dime-bounces@ietf.org] De la part de Jouni Korhonen
> Envoyé : vendredi 29 novembre 2013 09:30
> À : dime@ietf.org list
> Objet : [Dime] open issues #1 in DOIC
> 
> Folks,
> 
>           [OpenIssue: Do we assume that all requests in a pseudo-session
>           typically need to go to the same server?]
> 
> 
> The example here is in context of Cx. Not that I am expert on Cx (or anything)
> but based on the CCF the requests _may_ have destination-host. Thus, I assume
> that it is an implementation issue whether pseudo-sessions need to go to the
> same server.. I guess we cannot have such firm requirement. Correct?
> 
> - Jouni
> _______________________________________________
> DiME mailing list
> DiME@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dime
> 
> _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
> 
> Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
> pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
> a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
> Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou falsifie. Merci.
> 
> This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged information that may be protected by law;
> they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete this message and its attachments.
> As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been modified, changed or falsified.
> Thank you.
>